On 09 Dec, 2004, at 21:42, Charles H. Buchholtz wrote:
From: =?windows-1252?Q?L_a_s_e_r_B_e_a_m_=AE?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 16:43:06 -0500


   it
   is unlikely that the radiology equipment could possibly be
   larger than equipment that has been in the building before,

I don't know what sort of "radiology equipment" they are planning to
put in, but I'd be surprised if it was smaller than the equipment that
has been in the building before.  Particle accelerators can get very
big.  Brookhaven National Lab has a synchotron that's 843 ft in
diameter.

I'm guessing (and hoping) that they are going to make their own
radiation on site, rather than mining, processing, transporting, and
storing dangerous long-half-life radioactive materials.  Safer for the
community, safer for the world, and opens up new potential treatments.

As far as I know, the "Tandem" still exists in the back of DRL.
Don't know if it still is in working condition or not.
It's been there since the Penn-Princeton Accelerator project back in the 60s.


At one time it generated "radiated gasses" for HUP, and piped them "through the steam tunnels."

Yeah, been there, seen them, they (both the tunnels and the pipes) existed when we built PennNet back in the early 70s. At that point the lines had been unused for some time. I think they were removed not too long after we started working on PennNet, but I don't know for certain.

T.T.F.N.
William H. Magill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to