L a s e r B e a m � wrote:
>for instance, I just checked the uchs website, thinking I'd  find info
>about the imminent razing of convention hall (to  build a penn cancer
>center), but to my surprise there seemed  to be nothing. the dp had 2
>recent articles (see below),  but, from the articles, no one from uchs
>seems to be  involved, either as a commentator or protestor. odd? isn't 
>convention hall part of 'university city'? with historic  significance?
>it's got me wondering: to what extent does  'significance' have to do
>with preserving a single building?  with preserving certain buildings
>within a district? with  stemming, as some hd advocates have claimed,
>penn's  encroachment on the neighborhood?
>
>it seems that what uchs hd advocates consider to be  'historical' and
>'encroachment' can be given and taken  selectively, based on some
>definition (whose?) of  'significance.' and it would appear, in the case
>of the  convention hall, that all this has more to do with some 
>observance of power structures than it does with definitions  of
>historical fact... but perhaps I'm reading this all  wrong? I'm curious,
>what is uchs's stand on the imminent  razing of convention hall? and how
>would it view penn's  possible encroachment in 'non-significant' areas
>of our  neighborhood?

I'm also curious about UCHS's position on Convention Hall and the
Commercial Museum and would very much like for the Committee to Save
Convention Hall to work with them on saving these two landmarks. If anyone
from UCHS is reading this, please get in touch by email. I had emailed
UHCS, several weeks ago, about using some Civic Center postcard images in
our campaign, but have only heard preliminarily from someone who was going
to pass my request the the UCHS officers.

>btw, does anyone know if the civic center museum, right next  to
>convention hall, will also be razed? (wasn't it an  important site
>during the sesquicentennial here in philly?  with unique terra-cotta
>surfaces? I can't remember--)

In fact Penn's contractor had already begun exterior demolition on the
Commercial Museum, knocking several large openings in the western wing
just before thanksgiving. Then, after just a few days, they abruptly
halted the exterior demolition and tightly dealed the openings, as well as
all the windows in the rest of the building, with heavy tarpaulins and
duct tape.  It appeared that they might have sealed it to avoid dispersing
loose asbestos; I can't think of another good explanation. They've since
unsealed one of the openings and have been dumping interior debris down a
large sloped slide.

The Commercial Museum, designed by Joseph & John A. Wilson, is the sole
remaining building from the National Export Exposition of 1899, an event
that was essentially Philly's coming out party as a major industrial
superpower. The several other structures built for the exposition were
demolished within not many years later.

Here's a link to more about the Commercial Museum and other exposition 
buildings on the Phila. Architects and Buildings site:

http://www.philadelphiabuildings.org/pab/app/pj_display.cfm/2037

Cheers,
Jay "Jayfar" Farrell
Chairman
Committee to Save Convention Hall
-- 
PhilaDeco.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://PhilaDeco.com                              AIM: PhilaDeco


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to