On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Should there be no setting out of the larger picture, when Mr. Farrell > has been led to believe that the UCHS president is involved in some sort > of conspiracy with Penn?
Whoa, nothing written on this list led me to believe anything particular. I did, on my own, read the UCHS newsletter item about Mark Stuart's election as president and then I wrote: "It's worth noting that, according to the November issue of the UCHS's newsletter, their recently elected president, Mark Stuart, is an employee of Penn, at their Veterinary School. Could that be a factor in their apparent non-interest in Convention Hall and the Commercial Museum?" Nothing to indicate a conspiracy, but certainly there is at least the *appearance* of a conflict from my perspective. Your perspective may vary. I don't consider my observation as anti-UCHS and we would welcome their involvement in the Civic Center matter. Cheers, Jayfar -- PhilaDeco.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://PhilaDeco.com AIM: PhilaDeco Committee to Save Convention Hall fax bank http://www.hallwatch.org/faxbank/conventionhall/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
