Dear Monique: You should probably go to Hallwatch.org where you can get the full text of most bills. I think that there are several versions of the ethics bill.
You can visit: http://www.hallwatch.org/councilnotices/bills/search and input "ethics" in the "bill title" box. The main site is: http://www.hallwatch.org/ I hope that this is helpful. Sincerely, Matt -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:03 AM To: John Ellingsworth Cc: William H. Magill; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; University City List Subject: Re: [UC] Talking about local politics Hey - does anyone have the full number of that ethics bill, or the date it was discussed in Council? I keep track of all these for my Department, and for the life of me - I cannot find it on my list. Any further info about that bill (discussed in the messages below) would be useful and much appreciated. Thanks. M. M. Harvey, MPP, MPH John Ellingsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "William H. Magill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> org> cc: University City List <[email protected]> Sent by: Subject: Re: [UC] Talking about local politics [EMAIL PROTECTED] .purple.com 03/03/05 10:28 AM Please respond to John Ellingsworth Hah! Jannie support an ethics bill? One of my favorite examples of Jannie's ethics was apparent when bill 629 came up for consideration, and the UCCC took the extraordinary step of inviting the general public, along with Blackwell, to hear public opinion on it. At the end there was a general vote. The only person to vote in favor of the billboards was the lawyer representing the billboard companies (the real sponsor of the bill). At least 75 people were opposed. Jannie knew that a lot of people there were representatives from local community groups, so each no vote represented a larger opinion. Jannie voted in favor of the bill anyway. John Street, in one of his few useful actions as mayor, vetoed it. Kind of funny, eh? Today William H. Magill wrote: > Council has apparently completely exempted themselves from any consideration > of ethics. > > According to the Inquirer yesterday, they, along with the Chamber of > Commerce, NAACP and all the other "power borkers" in the city are of the > opinion that Pay to Play is not only customary and proper, but the > inalienable right of every City politician. > > > So, where does Jannie stand on Michael Nutter's Ethics Bill ... did she > support the original bill? > > > T.T.F.N. > William H. Magill > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > -- Thanks, John Ellingsworth 2005-03-03 ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
