The PFGMAUCD should make greater efforts to target only those who are
active in marketing and/or
supporting the UCD.
Are you saying you think it would be ok to put a sticker on someone's private property if they support UCD? On 4/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a message dated 4/4/2007 11:09:55 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Except that many of the stickers are on private property. And neither a first or 2nd layer of stickers should have been placed on private property. You're absolutely right! Yet, the subject guerilla marketing campaign mimics UCD's BID initiative attempt that not so subtlety attempts to usurp individuals' private property rights and make such estates subject to the collective consciousness of non-publicly controlled private institutions. The PFGMAUCD should make greater efforts to target only those who are active in marketing and/or supporting the UCD. As you are aware Councilwoman Blackwell has fought hard to make utility poles in the 3rd Councilmanic District free fire zones in the battle for public discourse and self-determination. On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:11:26 -0400 "B Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I think it would be really funny if the people at UCD made a bunch of stickers saying something like, "UC is the place to be," or "I ♥ University City" - and then sent the ambassadors out to cover all the bumperstickers that went up last week. This would simply be another example of UCD's self-serving vision and lack of institutional efficiencies. Ciao, Craig ------------------------------ See what's free at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503>.
-- ---------------------------------- University City Yoga http://www.ucyoga.com
