Philip, you are quite right. Is this something John Fenton could help with? sk ----- Original Message ----- From: Philip Forrest<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Univcity<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street
I'm not one for litigation so much, but there needs to be some recourse here. If there is writing or photos or even witnesses who saw the contractors sawing roots, they need to be brought to task and something needs to be made right. Those trees stood for decades without falling. 2 months of root suffocation wouldn't kill the tree, especially since the soil was quite moist for those months. That side of the block is ugly now and it's because of cutting corners. Cars were destroyed, people were put in danger, thousands of dollars in resources were spent, thousands of residents were inconvenienced. Us Philly taxpayers are footing the bill for a contractor's negligence. phil On Sunday 22 April 2007 12:32, UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote: > S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: > > Now we have something valuable for the local zoning committees to look > > at. > > or maybe something valuable for uc green to look into > (pruning and thinning). > > > > .................. > UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN > [aka laserbeam®] > [aka ray] > SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html<http://www.purple.com/list.html>>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html<http://www.purple.com/list.html>>.
