Frank you could pick nat shit out of pepper!
 
;-)
 
S
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 6:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UC] Stop-N-Frisk, Racial Profiling and Law Enforcement
 
Surveillance cameras are not mentioned in that article at all! They use
the word "surveillance" to refer to the level of Stop 'n' Frisk that is
used.
 
Like so:
 
"The empirical evidence from New York City is that stop-and-frisk as a
policy for getting guns off the street helped. I think that's fair to
say. The fact is that more surveillance in society tends to be
effective," said University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt.
 
"The only question is, where do you want to set the level of
surveillance? It's a cost-benefit analysis," he said. Cities need to
weigh the potential benefits against "liberty interests and the
inevitable racial disparities and increased complaints of police
misconduct" that have followed such programs, he said.
 
As an answer to your statement, I think being constantly videotaped IS a
violation of my rights. (And yes, I know it's already happening.)
 
More interesting is the list of "most read" and "most emailed" articles
in the right sidebar. That shows what people REALLY care about and it's
sure not election issues.
 
Frank
 
On May 12, 2007, at 05:32 PM, S. Sharrieff Ali wrote:



What you should also notice in the article is the data regarding
surveillance
cameras, a Fattah proposal. The reason being, if you can see who is
doing
what and breaking the law, you don't need to random search or risk
violating
the rights of innocent people.
 
S
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 2:40 PM
To: S. Sharrieff Ali; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UC] Stop-N-Frisk, Racial Profiling and Law Enforcement
 
Thanks S.
 
I saw the paper.  I hope folks read this.
 
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S. Sharrieff Ali
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: RE: [UC] Stop-N-Frisk, Racial Profiling and Law Enforcement
 
 
<http://www.philly.com/inquirer/home_top_stories/20070512_Stop-and-frisk
_controversy__What_price_for_a_safer_city_.html>
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/home_top_stories/20070512_Stop-and-frisk_
controversy__What_price_for_a_safer_city_.html
 
 
 

  _____  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.8/800 - Release Date: 5/11/2007
7:34 PM



 

Reply via email to