The unofficial balloting will be for the exact same proposal City Council 
passed overwhelmingly, that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down. It 
would prohibit any casino from being placed within 1500' of a school, church or 
residential neighborhood -- restricting possible slots parlors to a few tiny 
patches of Philadelphia in remote industrial areas and effectively outlawing 
all five proposed slot parlors, the three that didn't win the State's nod as 
well as the two that did -- Foxwoods in the Whitman area of South Philadelphia 
and Sugarhouse in the Fishtown area of the River Wards.

The objective of the unofficial balloting is to demonstrate massive popular 
opposition to the casinos the Commonwealth currently aims to impose on the 
city. Harrisburg long ago seized total control over Philadelphia casino 
development by passing laws that stripped Philadelphians of any local right to 
govern any aspect of casino choosing, planning and regulating. Rendell, who is 
totally pro-casino (he needs the revenue to pay for ambitious state social 
service expansions and tax cuts), is unleashing every weapon in his formidable 
arsenal of influence to stifle any expression of local control over casinos.

Opponents of casino gambling are the people running the unofficial vote and the 
only people who stand to gain from it. If you are opposed to slot-machine 
casinos in Philadelphia, you should seek out an "unofficial" polling place for 
this measure and cast your "vote", as a high total will have undoubted PR 
impact that will further your cause.

Proponents of casino gambling cite the huge revenues Philadelphia loses every 
year to its citizens who run down to Atlantic City to lose their money to New 
Jersey residents and tax-collecting agencies. Simply by losing their money at 
home, they should redirect their losses into the coffers of Pennsylvania 
governments and the pockets of Pennsylvania citizens.

-- Tony West
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 11:12 PM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Casinos: can someone summarize the issues?


  But there is supposed to be some sort of unofficial balloting conducted 
outside of the polls by the casino opponents.  According to the paper, the 
banned proposal would prohibit placement of a casino from virtually the entire 
city.

Reply via email to