In a message dated 5/23/2007 11:18:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does anyone know how/where/when this official statement will be made public? The UCReview did carry it in the article. It was one paragraph near the end. And Tony is correct in that UCD wasn't obligated in any specific way to release this statement, nor are they obligated to disclose what they're doing to investigate the incident, etc. But what they're "obligated" to do is one thing. Something entirely different is what an organization should do if it's trying to press an initiative that will take taxpayers' money under force of law, and have a quasi-governmental authority over the neighborhood and its evolution. Especially in view of the concern expressed by many in this community about lack of transparency, programs that do not reflect the vision of the vast majority of stakeholders, the secretive way in which the "steering committee" was selected &c &c &c. What Wendell Lewis and the $74,000 flackette are doing is proving the point made by the opponents of the NID, that the proposed organization will not operate in the open. Al Krigman Left of Alexander the Great and Bucephalis (didn't want to bring in the guy who rode into Jerusalem on a donkey, Michael) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
