Very true.? And again, no serious investigation will be conducted by reading newspaper articles.? They are only the reporter's rendition of the facts, second hand.?
-----Original Message----- From: Kyle Cassidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Sent: Sun, 27 May 2007 8:55 am Subject: RE: [UC] The IRS on political involvement by tax-exempt organizations When we're done that, let's assume that the jewelry turns out not to have been stolen but accidentally left in the pocket of the owners mink coat. Then we apologize to the landlord, and to the employee and go on about our business. We still have very little idea what happened that weekend. We have the student's allegations as posted in the daily news (which if true I think we all agree is indeed illegal), we have Lewis' statement, we have Jannie, who was also there, saying that neither John nor UCD had anything to do with a political rally and, as you pointed out, all this speculation gets us nowhere. I'm willing to wait a reasonable amount of time for UCD to conduct their investigation before I'm ready to hang anyone out to dry. But, like everyone else, I'm eager for official answers. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assume, arguendo (a favorite sport on this list), that some jewelry was missing from your apartment after a service call to unclog your drain. The landlord conducted an investigation, letting you know how this was being done, ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
