I liked being referred to as "Liz Campion, a prominent University City real-estate agent", but my statement was not properly recorded and the conclusion does not accurately reflect the outcome that I desire. The accurate quotes have been placed in Italics. I "suspect universities approach their neighborhoods in a top-down manner that ignores local leadership." I believe that "Councilwoman Blackwell for a long time has supported the 'trickle-down' theory of Penn investment." It was not reported, but I also said, "This can be wise. If a City grant can jump-start matching dollars from institutions and neighbors, and 2-3 dollars hits the local economy for every tax dollar spent, than the neighborhood wins." I said, "... if Penn is importing people who are not from the neighborhood and trampling on the wishes of the neighborhood..." But MY ending was, "it is not serving or representing the neighborhood. And if this is being communicated to the Councilwoman by unhappy voters, than I understand why she might shift to trickle-up economics". I define Trickle up economics as helping more needy constituents and hoping their use of dollars will lead to rippling improvements. I've heard people call her statements "Threats". I saw them as an attempt to satisfy constituents. If PENN or UCD continues to hand pick the "Community" representatives who sit on their boards, and if the neighborhood is fairly unanimous against this and other points of dissatisfaction, (such as the John Fenton suspension), than it begins to make sense to deliver money directly to 52nd Street or 64th Street and not flow it through UCD. My personal belief is that a well moderated UCD has the theoretical potential to do more good than the disconnected or redundant attempts of disconnected Community Associations. But, in the Thursday meeting, it was clear that many community leaders are not happy. I know that I do not like being ignored, patronized or discriminated against. Many of our neighbors said this is how they feel. I think some of our neighbors made a good case for changes that need to take place. We all deserve to feel respected and included in decisions about the people and "services" being 'offered' to the "community" by UCD and PENN. I did NOT say that I am "...supporting Blackwell's attempt to rein in UCD." I believe our politicians, (including Councilwoman Blackwell, a politician I like and respect), answer to us, the voters. I also believe UCD should answer to the community's that it is purporting to serve. What I support is the Councilwoman helping our neighbors define goals and ways (possibly including UCD) to better implement them. To be fair to Tony, our conversation was a hasty, and impromptu one. We bumped into each other on 43rd Street. I am amazed at how much, and how accurately he remembered so much of what was said. Thanks for letting me clarify things. Liz
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:25:04 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Click here: The Philadelphia Public Record
