"I already posted, to the best of my much distracted knowledge (it was an 
agitated political circus),
Lewis Wendell's only contribution to the meeting was to read a prepared 
statement."


Thanks for your best recollection, it is very confusing because of the 
misinformation.

Liz, please read the Public Record article closely.  This published report 
MAKES CLEAR that Mr. Lewis Wendell gave the report about Mr. Fenton's refusal 
to cooperate with the investigation in response to Councilwoman Blackewell's 
verbal account. These are quotes reported as taking place at the meeting.

 There is no doubt about what is in this published, Public Record, report about 
events that occurred at this June 7th meeting.  It's right there for all to 
see.   Now, Melani has a secret official press release dated June 8th.  

You confirmed, that to the best of your knowledge, no refutation and 
explanation was given by Mr. Wendell revealing Mr. Fenton's refusal to 
cooperate with the investigation. 

  Councilwoman Blackwell clearly told us that Mr. Fenton is not permitted to 
speak to anyone.  This Public Record report asserts that Wendell refuted that 
aspect of this issue on the spot.  These Wendell QUOTES have been said to be, 
"clearly stated," "explanations" and "replies."  
 

These false quotes never occurred.  This false reporting calls Councilwoman B a 
liar.  This false report of events was about a meeting witnessed by many 
people.  This is a very serious issue.  

Thanks,
Glenn

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Elizabeth F Campion 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 9:50 AM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Press release or Wendell statement?



  I already posted, to the best of my much distracted knowledge (it was an 
agitated political circus),
  Lewis Wendell's only contribution to the meeting was to read a prepared 
statement.

  I thought Lewis acted with remarkable forbearance to an intense degree of 
attack, some too personal and some way off the track.

  I felt he could (and perhaps should) have responded to some of the comments 
and questions that were not directly related to the John Fenton matter, but... 
it was not a UCD meeting, and Lewis may have been attempting to show some 
respect for Glenn Bryan's (PENN's) Agenda.
  Certainly no one else in the room, including myself, was interested in much 
more than the hijacking the meeting.

  Lewis Wendell, his lovely wife and beautiful children are our neighbors.
  They are good neighbors.
  We should not lose sight of this connectedness as we pursue remedies.

  Days after the meeting, I bumped into John Fenton at a retail establishment, 
and he would not discuss the matter, no matter how hard I pried.
  I forced a brief monolog of my sympathy and support, on him.
  All he would say was "Thank you."

  Both men continue to behave in ways that lead me to believe they would be 
better Allies than Enemies.

  Glenn, I find many of your posts confusing.
  I am not sure when nuance or sarcasm are in play.
  I am not sure where they dilute or confuse your message or turn away me (and 
other readers).
  Can you keep them simpler?

  Best!
  Liz

  On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:59:39 -0400 "Glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
    It's unclear what Melani/Ucd are doing with this June 8th secret press 
release and who else is involved. The Public Record reports that Lewis Wendell 
first provided the latest Fenton information in a public spoken refutation and 
explanation on June 7th at the public University of Pennsylvania meeting.  Read 
closely:

    '...She charged Fenton had been dismissed by UCD.

    Not so, replied UCD Executive Director Lewis Wendell, who attended the 
meeting. Fenton is on paid administrative leave pending the results of the 
internal investigation. "The UCD leadership is reviewing the matter and will 
determine an appropriate course of action once all the facts are known," he 
added.

    The investigation is slow in part because Fenton is not cooperating. 'UCD 
has made numerous documented attempts to contact John Fenton asking him to 
respond to the matter under investigation. Our calls and letters have gone 
unanswered," Wendell explained later.'

    "Not so, replied.." and "Wendell explained later" Folks, this is reported 
as supposedly given as a direct and public contradiction to Councilwoman 
Blackwell's spoken statements on June 7th, not cited from a June 8 press 
release.

    But, Wendell never made any thing like such a statement! 

    A large number of people were at the reported meeting. West is not 
reporting that this information came from a press release after the fact, but 
was clearly explained by Wendell. Remember in the list posts, West wrote, 
"clearly stated.".

     West is enclosing part of the non-existent quotes and not other parts. I 
suspect that is the reason to assert this secret June 8th press release.  
Little mistakes here?  I think not; the intention of the report is clear.  
Readers are clearly led to believe this spoken exchange occurred!

    Liz, Matt, Sharrieff, Freda, did anyone of you hear this explanation given 
by Mr. Wendell last Thursday? Did Mr. Wendell explain that Mr. Fenton was 
refusing to cooperate with the investigation? Did anyone hear that UCD calls 
and letters were "unanswered?" Did anyone hear about "numerous documented 
attempts?"

    Is it in any way believable that all of us whom have reported about the 
meeting missed this?????

     Did West hear this statement, hold back on clarifying all of our incorrect 
listserv reports, and now; he reports these very important quotes and clear 
statements alone?  This report is the most unbelievable attack to date upon our 
elected representative. It is a very very bold lie.

    Other attendees, please help confirm the meeting statements.  There is an 
announced UC Review report coming next week and the Penn meetings are supposed 
to have minutes.

    Thanks,

    Glenn







  Elizabeth Campion                               Cell Phone: 215-880-2930
  215-546-0550 Main, -546-9871 fax,  Desk + VM: 215-790-5653
  PRUDENTIAL, FOX & ROACH REALTORS, LLC
  Please read Consumer Notice & enjoy "HOME PILOT" tools at
                               www.PruFoxRoach.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.17/850 - Release Date: 6/15/2007 
11:31 AM

Reply via email to