Thanks, Paul.
 
Actually, let me clarify.  When one of my colleagues left for another position 
recently, we posted information on our website about her departure and her new 
position.  HOWEVER, she left us on "amicable" terms, and and not only agreed to 
but approved the text of what was posted.
 
If there is one thing that is very clear in this situation, it is that Mr. 
Fenton's departure from UCD was not amicable.

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 6/28/2007 6:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: [UC] Re: UCD - Lewis Wendell and His UCD Lashes Out


Which if true doesn't address Kathleen's point as to the source of the 
information - the former employer, the employee or the new employer.



-----Original Message-----
From: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: University City List <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 6:36 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Re: UCD - Lewis Wendell and His UCD Lashes Out


Turner,Kathleen wrote: 
> If I were to leave my current position and accept a position with > another 
> employer in the area, I really do not believe that my former > employer would 
> have the right to make public any information about my > new employment. 
> > I could, my new employer could, but I think it would be unethical, if > not 
> > illegal (Paul?) for my former employer to do so. 
 
 
in the news it's quite common to read about people working in non-profit 
organizations who resign their positions and go on to do 'x y or z'. 
 
yes, it is. 
 
it's even quite common, in the news, for the resigner's employer/boss to say a 
few words about the person resigning. 
 
yep. 
 
and when you DON'T read about these details, in the news, when there's a 
resignation, that, too, is news. 
 
uh-huh. 
 
 
.................. 
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN 
[aka laserbeam®] 
[aka ray] 
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES. 
  "It is very clear on this listserve who 
  these people are. Ray has admitted being 
  connected to this forger." -- Tony West 
 
[ps melani: no, fenton's new job was not announced in uc 
  review. the headlines in its last issue, june 
  20, were WHERE IS JOHN FENTON? remember? and 
  shareiff announced to this list on the 
  evening of the 20th that as of the 20th fenton 
  was working with blackwell. so john's good news 
  couldn't have been in uc review until this week. 
  and in this week's issue, wendell never makes 
  mention of it.] 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
______________________________________________________________________ 
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. 
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________ 
---- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the 
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see 
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>. 

________________________________

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL 
at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> .

Reply via email to