The NID is dead.
Al, you keep saying this as if you know it for truth. It seems to me that the NID is only dead when (1) UCD withdraws their efforts or (2) the vote occurs and the NID fails. The Councilwoman also has the ability to kill (or at least block) the NID but it's my understanding that she has repeatedly said she will do what her constituents want. Without a vote, it's not clear what her constituents do want. Can you please clarify your repeated assertion? If you did previously clarify this for others, please excuse me. Thanks, Doc On 7/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Around the turn of the last century, there was a great ethnic theater movement in places like New York, Boston, and Philadelphia -- where lots of immigrants settled. (Supposedly -- probably apocryphally) at one such performance, the famed Jewish tenor, Morris Kaplan, keeled over in the middle of an aria. The management brought down the curtain and the impresario stepped out to inform the audience that they should leave and would get coupons for another performance at the box office, because Kaplan had died. From the audience, a woman called out, "Give him chicken soup." The impresario said, "Madam, perhaps you don't understand. Kaplan is dead. Chicken soup can't help." The woman answered, "It couldn't hurt." The NID is dead. UCD, itself, may be in a lot of trouble. Wendell Lewis certainly is. Neither chicken soup nor discussions on this listserv can help any of them. Al Krigman Left of Ivan Grozny ________________________________ See what's free at AOL.com.
-- ---------------------------------- University City Yoga http://www.ucyoga.com ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
