In a message dated 10/22/2007 11:59:09 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My point was in regards to whether or not it's more beneficial to the process and the community for the developer to know the concerns of the community prior to the meeting. If Penn or it's developer (Lussenhop) wanted to know the concerns of the community -- ostensibly to get inputs and engage in a dialog to reach some kind accommodation -- they/he would have presented some basic ideas then held one or more community forums prior to starting the "legal" processes into motion. Getting this information the way he did, under the table -- as it were -- is just a way to prepare for objections, not to understand concerns and try to work with people who are worried about the implications as they affect the quality of their lives. Always at your service & ready for a dialog, Al Krigman ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
