Hi Andrew,

While our memories are fresh, could you confirm
another point until we get transcripts.

When the architect for the project was speaking, he
stated something like; earlier this summer, we
presented this to the Spruce Hill Civic Association
zoning committee at "two open and public forums."

Can you remember those words about two open and public
forums?  It wasn't Mr. Lussenhop or the main attorney,
it was the architect going over the picture charts.  

Thanks.  Sorry to hear you couldn't video the
proceedings.  The committee was recording, and I heard
them state that minutes are produced.

Glenn




--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> (Andrew, can you recall better, did anyone said they
> thought
> > the
> > HOTEL would be a great benefit to the community?)
> 
> I'd have to look at a transcript (or have some
> video!) to be sure, but I do
> think the two committee-people who voted to approve
> felt that it was the
> restoration of the mansion that would be the benefit
> to the community.  They
> all kept returning to that point, that restoring the
> building would be great. 
> I think the differences among them were whether so
> large a building was an
> appropriate trade-off to get the historically listed
> property restored.  I
> think the question of whether it's a hotel or a
> ten-story bowling alley falls
> mostly outside the reach of this particular
> committee.  I believe one or two of
> them may have said as much.
> 
> Andrew
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
> the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive
> information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to