The Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation were referred to a
few times in the review meeting.  I was surprised to see that they're actually
quite concise, though obviously open to interpretation.  Standard 9 was the
source for John Gallery's objections:

http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/rhb/stand.htm

The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation

The Standards (Department of Interior regulations, 36 CFR 67) pertain to
historic buildings of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy
and encompass the exterior and the interior, related landscape features and the
building's site and environment as well as attached, adjacent, or related new
construction. The Standards are to be applied to specific rehabilitation
projects in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and
technical feasibility.

1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use
that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building
and its site and environment.

2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The
removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that
characterize a property shall be avoided.

3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place,
and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as
adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings,
shall not be undertaken.

4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic
significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.

5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved.

6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where
the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature,
the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual
qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall
be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.

7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to
historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if
appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.

8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected
and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall
be undertaken.

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not
destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall
be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size,
scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the
property and its environment.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken
in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and
integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to