Wait a minute, this is a huge contradiction in the DP:


'Vice President for Public Safety Maureen Rush said
the incident was indicative of a larger problem
Philadelphia has with violence at its nightclubs.

"It is just another example of how easy it is for
people to have guns and how quickly an argument in a
nightclub can escalate," she said.'

But Coan says:

> 
>    http://tinyurl.com/2omp5r
> 
> > The incident took place as police were trying to
> disperse
> > the crowd of 200 to 300 people leaving the club at
> about
> > 2:00 a.m. [Sgt.] Coan said there were no reports
> of an argument
> > or fight inside the club before the shooting
> began.
> > 
> > "There was really no altercation," he said.
> "Basically,
> > the police were moving the crowd, trying to get
> the
> > traffic flowing, when one male produced a gun and
> started
> > firing in the direction of the police."
> > 
> > Police were already patrolling outside of the
> nightclub
> > because there had been previous incidents at that
> > location. They returned fire when the shooting
> began.
>  >
> > Several clubgoers were visibly shaken following
> the
> > shooting, and some argued with police officers
> about the
> > police's role in the incident.


Why would Maureen Rush talk about an argument inside
which completely confuses the issue?  Coan said there
was no argument.  How will Maureen Rush be able to
understand the issues that need to be investigated?
Or understand the criticism of police from the
"visibly shaken" clubgoers?  

Either Rush or Coan (apparently at the scene) have the
basic facts completely wrong.  Why else would Rush
have made that cleaner and safer comment? This just
gets deeper!

Glenn




> 
> 
> ..................
> UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
> [aka laserbeam®]
> [aka ray]
> SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
>    "It is very clear on this listserve who
>     these people are. Ray has admitted being
>     connected to this forger."  -- Tony West
>    "Ray's falsehoods are more sophisticated,
>     more believable" -- Tony West
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
> For more information please visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
> the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive
> information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to