When I scanned today's Sunday Inquirer, I came across the Parade Magazine 
insert, which had a full cover photo of the late Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan.  
Thinking it was a tribute, I began reading it, only to discover that it was an 
interview that had been conducted with her shortly before she was assassinated. 
 The story was written in the present tense as if she were still alive and was 
being interviewed today about her participation in  the elections that were 
originally scheduled for this week. The Inquirer front page included a small 
box at the bottom of the page that said that the magazine insert had already 
been published when Prime Minister Bhutto was assassinated on December 27.  But 
that certainly does not expain the Inquirer's breathtaking display of poor 
taste in not pulling the Parade Magazine from its Sunday editions. They had 
since December 27 to so, and that front page box could have instead stated that 
there would be no Parade insert out of respect for the fact that the Prime 
Minister had been murdered after publication of the interview. 
 
Karen Allen    's decision to he present tense as if she were being interviewed 
today.  the election was , discussing what she anticipate of her written 
despite the fact that the subject of its cover story, Parade Magazine's cover 
story was an interview with the late Benizir Bhutto, conducted in anticipation 
of the Pakistani elections originally scheduled for this weekwritten before In 
a breathtaking display of bad taste, the Inquirer included the Parade Magazine 
in today's paper, instead of pulling it. 

Reply via email to