[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While standard institutional PR Policy dictates ignoring
such correspondence, it nonetheless is seen for what it is
ignoring.
Failing to inform the subject staffers gives them
deniability - "no one ever informed us formally of such
concerns."
Glenn wrote:
Since all the staffers heard me contradict the claims in
person, following your advice would serve no purpose of
honor or ethics. Perhaps, you meant in your comments that I
should report about the proceedings to their superiors at Penn?
it's been long established here that tom lussenhop reads
this list. he's been subscribed to this list (since at least
january 2008 -- as [EMAIL PROTECTED]), and he has, in fact,
emailed me (back in november) along with other list
participants in reponse to posts made here.
if anything is said here that needs to go to tom's
superiors, lussenhop bears that responsibility as much as
anyone else.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
