This letter is being posted in anticipation of the Feb. 13 meeting about the
proposed hotel project at 40th and Pine Sts. It is being submitted on behalf
of Barry Grossbach, the Spruce Hill Zoning Committee chairman.

 

 

 

 Questions have been raised about what meetings have taken place before the
Spruce Hill Zoning Committee regarding the proposed hotel project at 40th
and Pine Streets.  Here are the facts:  Tom Lussenhop asked to speak with
the committee about a concept for a proposed project on the abandoned
nursing home site.  He was added to our meeting agenda on August 1, 2007,
and neighbors immediately adjacent to the site were informed and invited to
attend.  This was simply a preliminary discussion to consider the viability
of a hotel project at that location.  A recent discovery had revealed that
the mansion on the site was listed on the local historic register, and the
committee encouraged the developer to find a way to incorporate the original
portion of the mansion into any plans.  

 

Tom Lussenhop and his architect asked to appear before the committee in
September to share some conceptual drawings.  Our September 26th meeting
placed them last on a crowded agenda.  Based on that meeting, the committee
gave some limited feedback (concern about the height and about parking), but
decided to suspend any further consideration of the project pending the
outcome of discussions before the Historical Commission.  That was the last
time that the zoning committee of Spruce Hill discussed this project.

 

I asked that the hotel proposal be put on the agenda for the annual meeting
in November in order to have a broader forum for information and discussion.
A mailing about the meeting went to all Spruce Hill members, but without any
attached agenda.  The omission was Spruce Hill's, not the developers.
Additionally, the architect for the project, Sam Olshen, assumed when he
appeared twice before the zoning committee that the meetings were open and
public.  They were open and public, but they were not advertised in public
print.

 

 The bottom line-no one was operating deceptively or in bad faith.  Any
mistakes or omissions were made unintentionally. Members of the Spruce Hill
Zoning Committee last saw the hotel proposal at the November annual meeting
(those who were able to attend), and have not discussed the project at any
subsequent zoning meetings.  The meeting on Feb.13th will enable all
interested parties to see the current state of the proposal and to ask
questions and offer comments for the committee's consideration.  This, for
the zoning committee, is an interim step in the process.  Some project
opponents have secured legal counsel and are in discussions with attorneys
for the applicants, and the committee will reserve any judgment until we see
what, if any, points of agreement are reached.  In the meantime we will
continue to take the pulse of the  immediate neighbors and the surrounding
communities as the discussions move forward.

 

So, here is where we are:  The Spruce Hill Zoning Committee will continue to
seek feedback on this project.  We will do our best to address concerns on
all sides.  We will not preempt ongoing discussions between the parties, but
will await the outcome to see what, if anything the parties can resolve.
Whatever decision we as a zoning committee ultimately reach will be brought
to the full board of Spruce Hill for ratification.  Whatever the board
decides will then become the official position of Spruce Hill for
presentation to the city's Zoning Board of Adjustment.  I ask that everyone
now consider where we are, for that is more important at the moment then how
we got here.  The important point is what we do with what we have learned.
A healthy discussion and debate can enrich a community as long as it is
civil in tone and respectful of differences of opinion.  I'm confident that
our community is up to the task.

 

Barry Grossbach, Chair

Spruce Hill Zoning Committee

 

 

 

Reply via email to