In a message dated 2/14/2008 1:31:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
_http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2008/02/1 4/News/Area-unanimously.Opposes.Hotel-3209379.shtml?reffeature=htmlemaileditio n_ (http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2008/02/14/News/Area-unanimously.Opposes.Hotel-3209379.shtml?reffeature=htmlemailedi tion) Good article. One small error. The audience comprised 110 to 120 people, not 50 as the reporter stated. And, as an aside, only one of roughly 30 people who lined up to speak favored the project. This was Dennis Culhane -- a Professor of Social Policy and Practice at Penn. Anyone who wonders whether Professor Culhane has his finger on the pulse of the neighborhood or on anything practical about "social policy and practice" should check with members of the UC Swim Club for an opinion. Vox populei, vox dei est Al Krigman PS: I wonder whether Esaul Sanchez or Ed Datz, the Penn RE Dept people who tried to support Lussenhop's Folly, know the meaning of the term "economic rent seeking." I ask this because it's precisely what their Dept is doing with the property at 400 S 40th St. **************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. Go to AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
