Excellent letter!!  

City Paper readers still do not know the connection between Popkin and 
Lussenhop which was not disclosed as far as I can tell.  I hadn't seen the 
Popkin piece until Melanie used it as support for her cause.

One of us needs to insist that City Paper discloses this connection even if it 
was 2 weeks ago!  Allowing propaganda, deception, conflict of interest to 
flourish in corporate media unexposed is a very serious problem in our society. 
 I believe it explains why we allowed an illegal stupid war in Iraq and is at 
the heart of many other problems like the outrageous support of terrorists 
called the war on drugs. 

Magali showed the nonsense of the Popkin piece.  The dishonorable failure to 
disclose the close connection needs to be exposed too.

I'm leaving town for a week.

Good luck neighbors!  My heart is with the 400.  Beautiful response!

Glenn


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 11:55 AM
  Subject: [UC] Article by neighbor pooh-poohing Popkin's pretentious pap in 
the City Paper


  From the City Paper, March 5. A response to the pretentious pap by Nathanial 
Popkin hailing Lussenhop as a hero in last week's City Paper.

  Remember, you read it first here, on the popu-list (if you didn't already see 
it in the City Paper),
  Al Krigman

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Not NIMBYs
  The somnolent mutterers of Spruce Hill welcome responsible development.
  by Magali Sarfatti Larson

              
              
  Published: Mar 5, 2008 



  The hero of Giuseppe di Lampedusa's novel, The Leopard, invoked by Nathaniel 
Popkin [Slant, "Strait Talk," Feb. 28, 2008], was speaking in the 1870s, much 
before abusive building had choked the Greek temples near his Agrigento. Sicily 
today is an exemplar of how out-of-control development can spoil natural beauty 
and artistic treasures in a country (my native Italy) that has plenty of both, 
but not much clout to enforce any planning. So, indeed, Sicily is close to 
Philadelphia: We do not have effective planning, either, and our antiquated 
zoning code is adjusted and violated case by case, depending on developers' 
power and the depth of their pockets. 


  This is the situation that Michael Nutter denounced as a candidate and has 
immediately started to correct as mayor. No one suspects our Wharton-trained 
mayor of being against development; and the "somnolent mutterers" of Spruce 
Hill, as Popkin calls us, also welcome responsible development. The hotel 
project at 40th and Pine is neither responsible nor reasonable. 
  For years we hoped that the University of Pennsylvania would do something 
with the property it bought in March 2003, instead of wishfully thinking that 
neglect would take care of the dilapidated mansion. Nothing was ever discussed 
with the community (who knows, those NIMBYs might have had something worthwhile 
to say!) and nothing was proposed, for the rule is top-down. Preoccupied with 
its expansion east, Penn was not going to invest much in the west. The 
unexploited property was left to a coalition of developers, and they have been 
trying to cram their Hilton Homewood Suites down the neighbors' throats since 
October 2007. 

  The project had emerged as a five-story building, on the premise that the 
mansion could surely be razed. But the city Historical Commission, disregarding 
the advice of its own architectural committee, traded the house's preservation 
for an 11-story slab, shoehorned in a most unsuitable parcel, eliminating all 
side, back and front yards. The property sits in the midst of two registered 
historic districts where the maximum height is 35 feet, while Tom Lussenhop's 
Hilton hotel requires 114. Developers, after all, must make the maximum amount 
of money. That is progress, Sicilian style. 

  In University City, Penn has built two high-rises and a large complex of 
expensive apartments on commercial corridors, and new campus buildings have 
redesigned our streets. We have not objected to the plethora of new buildings. 
We object to Lussenhop's out-of-scale block. Parking is not our "ersatz 
barricade," but the legitimate concern of people who live here; the developers 
shrug it away with evasive "best scenario" answers. 

  Popkin ignores our neighborhood's scale, the architectural monuments it 
contains, and the qualities we want to save. His idea of informing the public 
is repeating Lussenhop's self-serving point of view and then heaping contempt 
on "some neighbors" (more than 400 at this count) who are protesting a 
devastating intrusion. Popkin does the same for Tunisia, embracing the image 
promoted by her ambassador, whose job is to court foreign investors. He should 
get to know Sicily and Tunisia objectively, or at least take the trolley to 
West Philadelphia; we would be delighted to give him a tour of the somnolent 
community we are fighting for. It is not easy to fight David and Goliath 
battles, but we still call it democracy. 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Magali Sarfatti Larson is a Berkeley-trained sociologist. Before accepting a 
chair at the University of Urbino in Italy, she taught for 20 years at Temple 
University. Now retired, she is active with the Open Borders Project in North 
Philadelphia. She was born in Italy and lived many years in South America and 
France. 







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1317 - Release Date: 3/7/2008 
8:15 AM

Reply via email to