Melani, I almost didn't reply because of your cross post to the censored Penn 
list!

But because you are you..let us prey;

Thanks to all Gods and Demons for the Campus Inn!  Thank you!  Thank you!


An honest observer of open public forums,
Glenn
PS:  Where were we Mel; when our neighbors needed the truth?




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [email protected] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Thoroughgood?  40th & Pine



  In a message dated 6/11/08 9:51:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

    A revealing article about the former owners of the personal care
    facility that used to be at 40th & Pine, and their history of neglect at
    other facilities as well.

    
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20080611__A_crime__crime__crime__crime_.html

    Regards,
    John Ellingsworth


  For those who don't have time to look up the link, I've posted it below 
(though the link shows a picture of the gate to her home).  

  This is the former use of the property now proposed to be the Campus Inn.  I 
don't remember the neighbors noticing or objecting to the former residents' 
plight under to Mrs. Lavin's use.  Where were we, when the occupants needed 
help?
  - Melani Lamond

  'A crime, crime, crime, crime'
  Squalid care homes owner fined 700G

  By KITTY CAPARELLA, MICHAEL HINKELMAN & GLORIA CAMPISI
  Philadelphia Daily News
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    215-854-5880 NEVER AGAIN, said the feds, and they meant it.
    Never again will owner Rosalind Lavin nor the managers of her four 
personal-care centers in Philadelphia and Media allow more than 210 residents 
to live in what U.S. Attorney Patrick Meehan called "appalling" conditions.
    Never again will Lavin or her managers allow residents to lie in vomit or 
feces for days, unattended.
    Never again will Lavin or her managers serve insufficient food to 
residents, like a slice of bologna and a piece of cheese between bread, and 
call it nutritious.
    Never again will Lavin or her managers be allowed to ignore the handing out 
of medications, or fail to seek medical care when it's needed for the disabled, 
mentally handicapped and elderly.
    Never again will she or her managers allow residents to wear inadequate or 
soiled clothing, or lie on filthy bed linens.
    Never again will she or her managers allow the physically disabled, the 
mentally handicapped or the elderly to live in grossly inadequate, structurally 
unsafe and dangerous firetraps that she called housing.
    And never again will Lavin be able to stuff her pockets and bank accounts 
with residents' Social Security and disability payments to fund her luxurious 
lifestyle - with a multimillion-dollar portfolio of fabulous homes in 
Villanova, Florida and New Jersey, and an aircraft - as alleged in her 
settlement agreement with the feds.
    Even as Lavin - a licensed pilot - denied wrongdoing of the above listed 
infractions in her civil settlement yesterday, workers were painting the 
exterior of her posh 14-room mansion beige and pinkish- tan, near the swimming 
pool and tennis court in her gated Villanova estate, called "Lionsgate," 
adorned with benches, sculptures and a babbling brook.
    There, workers are about to take on the massive task of painting the gutted 
interior of a first floor wing of the mansion, turning the walls into an 
elegant shade of beige and cream for her about-to-be renovated master-bedroom 
suite.
    For more than eight years, Lavin, 65, and her late husband, Robert, denied 
to city, state and federal authorities that they were aware of what U.S. 
Attorney Patrick Meehan called the "appalling" treatment of residents at her 
four personal-care homes, even after three homes were closed.
    The last facility, Ivy Ridge Personal Care Center, on Ridge Avenue near 
Kingsley Street in Roxborough, which had two residents last month, must close 
on Aug. 10.
    But now, the long-blond-haired Lavin must pay the feds $700,000 - a drop in 
the bucket to this multimillionaire - as part of the settlement.
    Yesterday, she signed the settlement agreement to never again own or 
operate a patient-, personal- or residential-care facility, or run a program or 
facility that receives federal health-care funds.
    Lavin owned three personal- care homes - or assisted-living facilities - in 
Philadelphia and one in Media, and Health Horizons, a management corporation 
that ran them, of which she and her late husband were the dominant shareholders.
    Besides Ivy Ridge, the other facilities included: Conlyn, 16th and Conlyn 
streets, Fern Rock, and Thoroughgood, at 40th and Pine streets, West 
Philadelphia, both closed in September 2002; and Brookwood, 1027 Ridley Creek 
Road, Media, Delaware County, closed in September 2000.
    Neither Lavin nor her attorney, Larry Besnoff, could be reached for comment.
    Jadwiga Ruta, a Polish immigrant, still gets angry when she thinks about 
her mentally handicapped daughter's three-day stay in the early '90s at Ivy 
Ridge Personal Care Center, and about Rosalind Lavin.
    "The people who live under her roof, they suffer," the elder Ruta, who now 
lives in Florida with her daughter, said of Lavin. "What she did was a crime, 
crime, crime, crime.
    Ruta said Lavin and her late husband were "making themselves rich from the 
poor people and the handicapped people."
    Her daughter had her to help her, Ruta said, but many of the elderly 
residents of the homes had no family.
    Ruta said that she had paid the Lavins $1,000 for her daughter's care and 
that Lavin had refused to give it back. "I borrowed the money," Ruta said. "I 
really, really, really couldn't afford it. But I thought it would be good for 
her."
    According to a lawsuit filed on the Rutas' behalf, Ruta placed her 
daughter, whom she declined to identify, at Ivy Ridge because Ruta, a 
now-retired teacher, had to work.
    Her daughter, then 33, was at the personal-care center just three days when 
Ruta received a call saying that her daughter - who was incompetent - was 
either sick or "faking it," according to a lawsuit filed in August, 1992.
    When Ruta rushed to the home, she found her daughter screaming and crying, 
with a diaper full of feces. The area around her was also covered with feces.
    Mrs. Ruta stayed with her daughter for several hours, trying to clean her 
up, and no one from the home assisted her. She told the Ivy Ridge staff that 
her daughter was ill, but none of the staff responded or even called for 
medical assistance, acording to the suit. They didn't even provide hot water 
for a cup of tea, she said.
    After several hours, the mother drove her daughter to a nearby hospital, 
where she was diagnosed with viral gastroenteritis, a fecal impaction and 
dehydration.
    Common Pleas Court upheld a jury verdict that Ivy Ridge was guilty of 
neglect. The young woman was hospitalized for three days, and then her mother 
took her home.
    Personal-care homes are assisted-living facilities where residents are 
helped with bathing and dressing, and the taking of medications, but don't need 
the kind of round-the-clock, skilled care provided in nursing homes.
    State regulators notified Lavin in October 2006 that they intended to close 
Ivy Ridge because she had failed to address repeated violations.
    In August and October 2006, for example, Ivy Ridge was cited for not having 
enough staff to provide at least one hour of personal care per day to its 
mobile residents.
    Some residents did not have adequate mattresses to sleep on, or lacked 
blinds in their rooms.
    Staff were not trained in first aid or CPR, and the home did not have a 
system in place to identify and document medication errors, the state said.
    Karen Kroh, the state's chief regulator of personal-care homes, said in an 
e-mail yesterday that Ivy Ridge is no longer operating as a personal-care home, 
but as of last month two personal-care residents still lived there, as did two 
or three "independent occupants."
    Meehan said that residents of many personal-care homes throughout 
Pennsylvania are "uniquely vulnerable" because of their mental and physical 
disabilities and because they are dependent on others to care for them.
    He pointed out that personal-care homes are not as tightly regulated as 
nursing homes by the state Department of Public Welfare.
    According to Meehan, there were 1,500 personal-care homes in the state last 
year and only 37 state inspectors. He said that 1,200 homes were at one time or 
another operating without a license.
    A spokeswoman for the Department of Public Welfare said yesterday that the 
department has since hired five more inspectors and that all of the state's 
personal-care homes are operating with either a license or a conditional one.
    About 50,000 Pennsylvanians live in personal-care homes. *




  **************
  Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008.
  (http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102) 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG. 
  Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1497 - Release Date: 6/11/2008 
8:32 AM

Reply via email to