http://www.philly.com/inquirer/education/18554429.html


This is an interesting article about drop-outs and an adult literacy program.  
It gives some good information and statistics to consider.  At the end, 
consider how the federal funding has been slashed.


I believe in a different model to address Philadelphia's serious adult  
literacy problem.

Small community-based programs are needed to help overcome barriers for 
literacy program completion.  Literacy and employment help are the best core 
services to be delivered in neighborhoods, but outcomes would improve 
tremendously if a thorough assessment of a participants real life problems was 
also completed at baseline.  Then matching additional intervention (through 
high quality referrals) is done with continued follow-up.  

The baseline assessments, regular case managed follow-up, and core and 
beginning employment and literacy services need to occur in the neighborhoods.  
Both trust and the message of planning, testing and alternative actions must be 
developed by the individual before the education goals can be reached. 
(Curriculum needs to be different from high school too.  I like to begin each 
class with the newspaper, critical thinking, and discussion.  It warms up the 
brain for fractions and prepositions.)

Of course, the network of supporting social services is in shambles in poor 
urban cities, so that it is a never ending responsibility for the case manager 
to develop and investigate referral partnerships.  Social service systems force 
people through a program without any of them dealing with the whole person with 
complex problems.  Our social service systems set up too many individuals for 
another failure while misleading the general population.  Like the bridges and 
other infrastructure, the social service delivery systems are mostly broken.

I think too many people believe that individuals who drop out or develop mental 
health problems at any time in their lives are beyond hope.  The fact is that 
the interventions are stripped to the bone.  Society uses "magical thinking" 
when we believe a lifetime of accumulated problems born in poverty can be 
addressed with a series of magic bullets.

I personally don't believe that this society has the will or belief that all 
citizens should have a chance at life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  
We will not address public education, in the first place, nor do we have any 
desire to ameliorate the individual hardships from our sacrosanct mean spirited 
foolish policy directions.  

Just my opinion,
Glenn      

Reply via email to