>it's fascinating how, as far back as march, the dp was >framing the question of the hotel in terms of parking. > >and here we are now, with pcpc scheduling its hearings about >the hotel in terms of parking. > >what happened to the main issue: the hotel's massive scale >and height and footprint? >
Yes, you noticed this attention to the single issue, parking. I previously posted a prediction that a superficial discussion of the "traffic study" would precede PCPC approval at the 2nd hearing. I wanted a public record to demonstrate how obvious the pattern between the false record keeping, propaganda and the subsequent hearings becomes to a witness. All of the comprehensive testimony and discussions about the various issues were completely edited out of the official "public record." Here is the link to a two hour hearing, May 20, reduced to four pages on the PCPC website (pages 4-8). Please note how these "minutes" appear like transcripts and the need to review this traffic study is highlighted. Anyone witnessing the two earlier PHC hearings and "the public record" of same, would have expected the superficial discussion of "the traffic study" the moment they read these PCPC records! The backroom dealing is not hard to recognize, in person, even though it is impossible to see from the public record. They've got a tight little system between city hall, the DP, and the Franklin building. http://www.philaplanning.org/pubinfo/minutes/5-20-08%20mins.pdf -----Original Message----- >From: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sep 22, 2008 1:00 PM >To: University City List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [UC] Did anyone see this from the DP? > >Glenn moyer wrote: >> I missed this one. This an interesting "editorial" >> >> It makes sense that some young writer, inexperienced journalist, would be >> susceptible to the snakes behind the Penn propaganda machine. I doubt Ms >> Hart understood how she and the DP were being used. >> >> >> >> http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2008/03/03/Opinion/Editorial.Responsible.Development-3246870.shtml > > > >it's fascinating how, as far back as march, the dp was >framing the question of the hotel in terms of parking. > >and here we are now, with pcpc scheduling its hearings about >the hotel in terms of parking. > >what happened to the main issue: the hotel's massive scale >and height and footprint? > > >.................. >UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---- >You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see ><http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
