>This quotation derives from Nicole Contosta, who has covered this issue >extensively for the University City Review for many months. > >Neither Contosta nor any other journalist is free of error. But I'll go >with her report against that of a "citizen journalist" who faked an >imaginary nursing home on Market St. on this very list, not one month >ago. Every claim Glenn publishes at, or about, public meetings should be >dismissed by choosy readers, unless backed by independent testimony. > >-- Tony West
>From UC Review Sept. 24 "With regard to the hotel's height, Greenberger concluded that because Campus Inn had cut five rooms from its top floor, "it had taken the bulk out of it and pulled it back by both sides. This is done in Vancouver as a matter of zoning, though I would prefer it to be smaller." Hahaha. It seems like the memory of that evil Glenn actually is confirmed by Ms. Contosta. Evil Glenn remembered that it was Mr. Greenberger making the comparison (not Jastrzab) and even remembered the correct city, Vancouver. Meanwhile, Mr. West (who was not in attendance) had his mistake corrected by evil lying Glenn. But Mr. West attacked the veracity of evil Glenn while continuing to make up a quote, attribute it unfairly to Mr Jastrzab, and continued to claim that it was reported in the UC Review. Hahaha-What the hell is wrong with West? The text of the West wind blowing, posted on the public list: >>> And that's why I originally quoted a remark by Gary Jastrzab of PCPC >>> that you ignored in the original news article, and that you just ignored >>> again: “Initially we had major issues with the height of 11 stories. But >>> with the cut-outs," added Jastrzab in reference to the five rooms that >>> were removed from the hotel’s top story, giving it the appearance of a >>> reduced scale from certain angles, "the staff views this development as >>> a very difficult trade-off.” Evil lying Glenn's response posted on the public list: >> Had Mr West attended the hearings for which he provides expert analysis; he >> would know that Mr. Greenberger and not Mr Jastrzab had been the person (new >> Penn/Nutter director and commissioner) who interjected this charade. >> >> Mr. Greenberger compared the new, hidden, drawings/plan to another city (I >> believe Vancouver) and made comments similar to the ones above. Mr. >> Greenberger was ostensibly suggesting that PCPC commissioners had actually >> thought about the old drawings and new drawings and had arrived at some >> rational approval of this new bullshit as being a Penn improvement. -----Original Message----- >From: Anthony West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Oct 3, 2008 9:39 PM >To: univcity <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [UC] Scale and its adjudicators > >This quotation derives from Nicole Contosta, who has covered this issue >extensively for the University City Review for many months. > >Neither Contosta nor any other journalist is free of error. But I'll go >with her report against that of a "citizen journalist" who faked an >imaginary nursing home on Market St. on this very list, not one month >ago. Every claim Glenn publishes at, or about, public meetings should be >dismissed by choosy readers, unless backed by independent testimony. > >-- Tony West > > >Glenn moyer wrote: >>> And that's why I originally quoted a remark by Gary Jastrzab of PCPC >>> that you ignored in the original news article, and that you just ignored >>> again: “Initially we had major issues with the height of 11 stories. But >>> with the cut-outs," added Jastrzab in reference to the five rooms that >>> were removed from the hotel’s top story, giving it the appearance of a >>> reduced scale from certain angles, "the staff views this development as >>> a very difficult trade-off.” >>> >> >> Had Mr West attended the hearings for which he provides expert analysis; he >> would know that Mr. Greenberger and not Mr Jastrzab had been the person (new >> Penn/Nutter director and commissioner) who interjected this charade. >> >> Mr. Greenberger compared the new, hidden, drawings/plan to another city (I >> believe Vancouver) and made comments similar to the ones above. Mr. >> Greenberger was ostensibly suggesting that PCPC commissioners had actually >> thought about the old drawings and new drawings and had arrived at some >> rational approval of this new bullshit as being a Penn improvement. >> >> Let that West wind blow, >> >> Mr Moyer, citizen journalist >> >> >> > > >---- >You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the >list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see ><http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
