Wilma:

That story about Irvine's history is an urban legend. It was actually designed 
by prominent architect Horace Trumbauer 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace_Trumbauer), who was also responsible for 
the Keswick Theatre, the Public Ledger Building, and campus buildings for 
Hahnemann, Jefferson, Duke, Harvard, and the Tyler School of Art.


 
And, on a related and timely note: I don't know if they still do it, but it 
used to be that every year, around Hallowe'en, the original silent version of 
"The Phantom of the Opera" would be shown at Irvine, with accompaniment on the 
Curtis Organ.

Dave



 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilma de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; UnivCity listserv 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 6:41 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] relevance of comment on Inky article critizing the design of 
the Perelman Center













I went there on Sept. 26th for GI because it’s moved to the 4th floor in the 
Perelman Center.



They have built and named new streets in order to enter the Free Parking Garage 
for Patients. (try to find it!)



It was quiet, not crowded and easy to get through because it’s not quite 
finished.



Still, it is ugly, forbidding and most certainly not pedestrian friendly as 
most of Penn’s modern buildings.



Gee, everyone thought Irvine Auditorium was poorly designed, but he forced them 
to construct it because he became rich and donated money despite not making it 
at Penn’s School of Architecture.



I also hate that Lego building at 40th & Chestnut Sts.





On 10/24/08 4:21 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Beloved friends and neighbors:

 

Inga Saffron wrote an article in the Inquirer berating the architectural design 
of Penn's new Perelman Cancer Center across from CHOP.

 

One of the reader comments -- as follows -- could well have been written about 
our own monstrous consequence of Penn's lack of architectural sensitivity.

 


 

Inga Saffron is an architecture critic, and what she  has done is appropriately 
critiqued the style of this building, not its  internal qualifications as a 
treatment center. Pandering for sympathy is not  going to change the fact that 
architecturally, this building doesn't do its  job. Yes, hospitals have to 
accommodate vehicles, but in a city any building  has a responsibility to do 
its part relating to its surroundings. This  building may do its job as a 
hospital, but it completely ignores its  surroundings and the city, and pays 
only attention to its insular purpose. As  architecture it has failed.

 

 


Al Krigman

reminding you that you read it first, here, on the popu-list









Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration 
required and great graphics –  check it out! 
<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001>
 








 

Reply via email to