| In a relevant letter to the editor of the UC Review, the continuation of government grants to some local businesses during the financial crisis was recently discussed. While essential government services to all Philadelphians are being slashed and most Philadelphians are terrified by threats of massive increases in regressive taxes or new fees, like this one; a privleged few still receive government grants to help them through rough economic times. (Those who followed the Campus Inn saga know that those poor developers were also expecting major public loans from the state despite the economic collapse). As crisis capitalism continues to exploit and increase fear among the vast majority of people locally and nationally, the use of the "carrot and stick" method of oppression looms large. Bogus trash tickets, massive property tax increases and a barrage of new or increased fees are deliberatly being used to terrorize the middle class as well as the hopeless masses. Meanwhile, the singular hope for future security is being simultaneously symbolized in the PR through the welfare showered on the connected and obedient few. Yes for the few, who support destructrion of democratic processes, the rule/agenda of our corporate masters, and back room deal making; the government agents of the power brokers will shower all sorts of relief, the carrot. And the rest of us have our sense of security stripped, as we get the stick swung at us over and over again. I seem to recall that in addition to UCD sucking 60% of the grant money for administrative costs for its upscale Baltimore light project, they had some separate vaguely defined money that looked like " walking around money" for good businesses. If good businesses support the trash fee and bogus trash tickets, how much can they receive as rewards? (Remember, how some award winning real estate agents could arrange for special pick-ups of their leaves, after thumbing her nose at the public process?) Have the tax abatements, welfare for wealthy developers, ended? Has Penn been required to pay for services after taking the Penn Tower off of the tax roles? (I believe it's a quarter of a million Penn saves on the Penn tower alone.) No, but the pools in some districts remain closed and the hard working barbers are threatened with this fee, bogus trash tickets, and outrageous L& I demands, at the same time that they're paying increased parking ticket fines! Here is another good example of the boldness in government sponsored special privleges for those with the power, at the same time as most are being whacked harder: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20090708_Monica_Yant_Kinney__To_serve__protect_______and_park_illegally.html Banned from the censored Penn list, Glenn -----Original Message--------- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see |
- [UC] Businesses in UC are struggling Krfapt
- Re: [UC] Businesses in UC are struggling Anthony West
- RE: [UC] Businesses in UC are struggling Andy Frishkoff
- Re: [UC] Businesses in UC are struggling Glenn moyer
