Neighbors, I need to respond to the post from President Chance and Vice
President Siano from FOCP. Sorry for the inconvenience. I know it's
silliness but my responses to the silliness need to be publicly
recorded. Maybe you'll get some laughs:
Moyer says in "What Would Honest People Do" ...I would then consider
the effect on our neighbors from the years of refusing to give proper
public notices of meetings and agendas. I would apologize to the
community in the UC Review and I would promise to carry out the orders
of the membership in the future. I would also apologize for a long
established pattern of exclusion and secrecy, and I would promise to
make the association inclusive and transparent."
Chance responds:
"But would you help to distribute such notices? Would you do anything
to aid the organization?
FoCP does not need to apologize. We have done the best we can to work
for the benefit of Clark Park and all its users.
Glenn Moyer needs to apologize for wasting the valuable time of the
organization and the community. "
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Mr Chance, as you know, the minutes of the FOCP Board are secret. I've
explained, repeatedly, that the FOCP members ORDERED the FOCP leaders to
publish meetings and agendas in the UC Review since April 29, 2003.
(You were present at that meeting)
The members understood that FOCP leaders had been engaged in back room
deals with UCD to redesign Clark Park, starting in 2001. Redesigning the
park is a matter that affects the whole community, and not just the hard
working volunteers of FOCP!
Your fallacious argument questioning my volunteerism does not justify
your defiance of the FOCP members! It is extremely simple to post
announcements in the paper, and it is the will of the members that you
defy, not mine! Asking if I will do this required duty for you is a
pathetic attempt at a distraction, after years of defying the members.
(Have I not publicly begged for the time, dates, and locations often
enough! Your questions are ridiculous.)
I've already given you documents 1-3 which show how my volunteerism was
answered, as if that were the important issue. Following again, is the
portion which shows that the FOCP President understood the ORDERS OF THE
MEMBERSHIP in 2003. Your secret minutes have the texts of the three
motions unless the shredder is working overtime. How convenient that
your minutes are top secrets? Read:
President of FOCP, 5/6/2003 "I'm sorry if there's been a
misunderstanding but I haven't decided yet on who would chair this group
or who will be charged with notifying UC Review of our upcoming meetings
and agendas."
