"Michelle Rhee Chancellor of Schools in Washington, D.C. has just fired a lot of teachers based on students' test scores. Amazingly she has procured $20 million for the schools from the private sector, but here's the rub: no one gets a cent unless SHE is Chancellor of Schools.

Talk about a stacked deck, securing YOUR job, while ensuring others lose theirs for specious reasons."


Wilma,

For many years, I studied the delivery of addiction services (social work) and the jobs of front line workers. Like teachers, they were scapegoats through the same type of simplistic focus on flawed assessments to distract from the failed policies and the sabotage of their profession. Destroying a public behavioral health care system was the ultimate goal, just like destroying a public education system is the goal of No Child Left Behind/Race to the top.

Substance abuse counselors are blamed and evaluated only for the drug use of clients and evaluated on pathetic paperwork checklists. AND THE REAL POLICY FAILURES ARE NEVER LOOKED AT! I believe the comparison of these two professions is very important and warrants serious discussion!


From a feminist perspective, the two professions can be looked at as traditional woman's work in a patriarchal system. Consequently, both vital professions have been traditionally undervalued and receive low pay. But the condescending ideology from the elite researchers in the fields leads to two important structural problems, which are not understood by the general public.


First is the failure to create the structures for individuals to develop as professionals. (Both professions lose an extraordinary number of young professionals in the early years.) Second is the refusal to allow the ancillary services necessary to improve outcomes among the population with multiple and complex issues.

It is not the front line workers who are lazy idiots, but the elite policy makers who ask for water to be made from wine!!!! We, the people, need to understand why outcomes are less than ideal when the systems and individuals are sabotaged. We have the grapes and the wine press, and poor outcomes come from poor policy.



Public school teachers and social workers in public systems are not generally engaged like other respected professionals. They deal with complex problems but their jobs leave them immediately isolated in complex situations. Trainings and manuals tend to be useless and condescending. They have no built in structure to allow them to be researcher practitioners. They don't have journal clubs, mentors or collaborations with other professionals to advance themselves or their field. The continuing development structures for other respected professionals are the right way to engage a developing professional! Teachers and social workers are told to develop in isolation by studying condescending and useless interventions by elite researchers.

As for making wine from water- Addiction therapists are told to keep their homeless, depressed, unemployed clients with low literacy skills from using drugs. When they don't, they are blamed for being lazy and stupid, like teachers who have children with multiple life issues. (The systems have no way to coordinate the care for the individuals being served. By not addressing the child's problems in one area; poor outcomes in other areas like reading will emerge.)

Using ridiculous measures to blame front line workers is a deliberate distraction from the underlying structural problems in the systems. Should teachers and social workers continue to accept blame in the midst of such broken systems and the failure of the elites to stand up and educate the general public about the real reasons for less than ideal outcomes???

I think front line workers in these two fields need to act up and fight back in solidarity!

Glenn
PS: Yes the corporate vultures are ready to profit from the sabotage of front line workers!




On 7/23/2010 11:20 AM, Wilma de Soto wrote:
Michelle Rhee Chancellor of Schools in Washington, D.C. has just fired a lot of teachers based on students' test scores. Amazingly she has procured $20 million for the schools from the private sector, but here's the rub: no one gets a cent unless SHE is Chancellor of Schools.

Talk about a stacked deck, securing YOUR job, while ensuring others lose theirs for specious reasons.

Reply via email to