Joe, 

I¹m a lawyer, and no one appreciates how horrible legal proceedings are
better than a lawyer ­ the sensible ones among us avoid them like the
plague. It¹s often our clients who are enamored of lawsuits, but we get
blamed for being litigious.  I¹ve let this go this long because I appreciate
that I do not want to resort to that.

You are right, it would be better to have a less expensive option.
Unfortunately, those options (arbitration, for example) inevitably end up
being stacked in favor of the moneyed business interests and against the
consumer.

Nevertheless, I appreciate your idea of some sort of community
accountability.  Which is why I finally broke down and posted my post to
these lists.  I¹ve been considering it for a long time, and I finally chose
this as a last resort to suing.

I¹ve raised my grievance with our community.  I¹m a lawyer, Joe.  I fully
appreciate that the threats I¹ve made here will be passed on to Mr. Schopp.
I am hoping that there are people on this list who have relationships with
Greg Schopp who will kick him in the ass and say ³Pay attention!²

The last thing in the world we want to do is sue Greg Schopp, but
unfortunately, under the circumstances, I¹m not sure we have much
alternative.  At least to get hi to take us seriously, or to be properly
compensated for this delay.

Kimm

On 9/4/10 1:39 AM, "Joe Clarke" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kimm,  I don't know anything about your encounter with Greg, I only know of
> his craftsmanship, which can be seen at several houses of people I know.  I
> know that that isn't the issue with him, as you have said.  You deserve your
> money back at least and some resolution of the contract.  It would be great if
> we had some mediation in these types of matters, especially when the vendor is
> a community member themself.  It would be less expensive all around and
> perhaps be an effective means, with out resorting to the lawyers, of 
> maintaining some cohesive Good faith with others in the community.
> 
> Joe Clarke
> 
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Kimm Tynan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I urgently need a good recommendation for a porch contractor.  Please do not
>> recommend Greg Schopp.  We signed a contract with Greg Schopp approximately a
>> year ago.  He was supposed to start in February.  Then the snow happened,
>> which I could understand, and he said May.  Then he said ³When I finish the
>> job down the street.²  We haven¹t seen any progress on the job down the
>> street for months.  I¹m going to go have a chat with them this weekend. We
>> paid this asshole a big upfront fee, he bought some materials.  I¹m sick to
>> my stomach, we refi¹d to pay this guy, our porch has deteriorated for a year.
>>  We are probably going to have to sue him and may pursue criminal charges.
>>  Seth Williams is an old friend of ours.
>> 
>> If you are a homeowner, do not do business with this man.  He came to us
>> highly recommended through the lists and others in the neighborhood.
>> 
>> We hired him because he said he was going to do a historically-accurate
>> replacement with high-quality materials (wood instead of fiberglass).  From
>> what we have heard he is a master craftsman.  When we took exception to using
>> mahogany and insisted on sustainably-forested woods, he went to enormous
>> lengths to work with us on that.
>> 
>> But he took our money and has largely disappeared, and our porch is getting
>> more dangerous by the day after all this time.  And I don¹t feel like I can
>> cancel the contract and sue his ass until I have someone else waiting in the
>> wings to step in.
>> 
>> Please recommend someone good who will step in and take over this job
>> quickly.  I will impose on my husband to take unhistorical fiberglass and
>> features (we won¹t take eco-unfriendly woods.)  We tried to get this job done
>> well.  That didn¹t work.  Now we need to get it done quickly. Please help.
>> 
>> Kimm
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ucneighbors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.asc.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/ucneighbors
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to