thanks, darco
Lalevic, Darco wrote:
Sure, as Glenn points out, numerous attempts to paint the
neighborhood as a wild, out of control neighborhood that
UCD and associated entities have now made safe.
I disagree with UCD taking on an enforcement roll of any
kind. I disagree with the entire Clark Park
revitalization plan. I think it's wasteful at the least,
and at worse, part of an effort to "clean up" the park to
make it more appealing to the gentrification of the
neighborhood and push certain people out. The structure
of the UCD is designed to advocate for the corporate
entities (and while, yes, it's their money mostly, the
net effect is the general public is left out of
decisions).
-----Original Message----- From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:07
AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [UC] Clark
Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR
Lalevic, Darco wrote:
I too am often offended by the bias and misinformation
that is often propagated as marketing for "University
City".
can you cite examples of this?
Sure, I disagree with UCD and FOCP on many issues,
examples?
The fact is, by not engaging the argument in a logical,
academic way, you've pushed the relevance of your
argument to the wayside.
..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
