People of the district,

One of my Clark park friends mentioned the need for a lawyer.He said he feared that Clark Park would be a new Rittenhouse Square.Of course, he is right.

Months ago, when I publicly confronted the city commissioner, who serves the Praxis agenda; I was concentrating upon the privatization of Clark Park only.However, the corporate servants were concentrating on "public-private partnerships" and "revenue streams."It's clear to me that the privatization and commercialization of Clark Park is merely a pilot experiment for the new gentrified city core.

Point:Those Philadelphia parks and recreation facilities, which are not converted to commercial spaces and privatized, will be closed in the new city.

The physical redesign of Clark park as a commercial space should be clear now:The police raids before the park closing communicated with force, that indigenous residents were not to be welcomed back in the new commercial space.Also, closing the park to disrupt two park seasons is a well-practiced delaying tactic used to push away the former loosely organized community from returning to gentrified public spaces.(Many people probably believed that closing the park in the fall and at the beginning of the next season had some reasonable cause-haha)

When you imagine the new fountain and the new garden, which will use up all remaining space to the HMS school, the UCD vision might be clearer.UCD decided on the vision for a silent space where the gatherings and activities of the past 100 years would not be tolerated.So they are using up all open space in the physical redesign.(In the future, the bowl is to be turned into a performance venue for upscale expensive concerts and plays)

Do folks see why all the groups who used the park and the general public were barred from the planning process since the beginning???? Do folks see that this is the same goal of the plan that was rejected by the overwhelming majority of residents 7-8 years ago???

UCD waited 7 years while pretending that giving West and Siano $20 at the farmer's market was the same as an inclusive transparent public process!Do you remember how furious they all became when I continued demanding, for years, that park users be included in a transparent process????They frightened people when they refused to allow me 1 minute to state the secret exclusive process for the FOCP record.(FOCP leaders wanted to intimidate everyone else into silence with their condescending bullying.)

I guess I am vindicated now, and no one still believes that the good neighbors just wanted to do maintenance on Clark park-haha.

For each UCD project over the past ten years, the exact same corporate process has been used against the indigenous people in this dying divided community.Misinformation and lies are churned out from the powerful University propaganda machine.Secret backroom deals are discovered when the civic associations are called community approval.And a network of loud, good neighbors, attacks all dissent with incredible meanspiritedness using the usual techniques of straw man, ad hominem, red herring, censorship, etc.

Is the Clark Park Partnership any different than the BID steering committee, the SHCA Planning Committeee for the hotel, or the original master plan steering committee for Clark Park?But very few among us were willing to look at the basic underlying colonialism which foretold our loss of rights if we failed a commitment to solidarity and democratic principles.

The majority of us closed our eyes to the real threats because we hoped for trickle down outcomes to outweigh our loss of our community and rights.We closed our eyes to the truth and our need for solidarity.We refused to put the principles and processes of democracy, or our community, before our blindfolded cravings for riches.And they won the war.Now we will see the disaster of our hope in bullshit and trickle down riches!

The corporations and University labeled our community a criminal gang years ago.They insisted that we be excluded from discussions of our fate and be obedient consumers waiting for their charity.Giving $20 and kissing up to civic association leaders was a ridiculous suggestion for stopping this.As was "positive thinking" and the concept that all dissent is the crazy ranting of wankers.

Most long-term residents knew that these civic gangs (FOCP, SHCA, UCHS, etc.) were broken and dedicated to bullying long before the University employed neo-colonial tactics to fool the foolish leaders.And the 'cleaner safer" literature was such obvious bullshit that it shows the blindfolded hopes of the majority gambling on trickle down economics and the beneficence of corporate wolves.

I spent 5 years expending enormous time to protect the Clark Park Music and Arts festivals.I pleaded with people to recognize that these were only temporary stays. That unless we asserted our rights as citizens rather than our cravings as consumers waiting for trickle down outcomes, we would find ourselves with no rights in this upscale shopping district.

The new permit requirements that all park users will receive for the new commercial space should be referred to as rental leases.Or you can continue to believe the sweet little lies and call these the law-haha.

A former citizen of West Philadelphia,
Glenn

Reply via email to