With only some nature trail clearing, some poison ivy treatments, and a few ad 
hoc remediations, a park can be absolutely dreamy.   Rick Conrad

On May 27, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Lalevic, Darco wrote:

> Sorry to not be able to continue our previous conversation Glenn, busy with 
> life and work and all that.
>  
> So, taking your view that Clark Park will soon have no trespassing signs and 
> a big red and blue P emblazoned on the new open area in Park A…
>  
> It seems you are trying to address a symptom, not the cause. Much as Ms. 
> Saffron points out, the problem really lies within the lack of money for city 
> parks. She points out that Chicago spends 30 times Philadelphia’s, and a 
> brief search shows NYC spends some 20 times what Philly does on parks.
> So, considering that our political leaders consider spending money on DROP is 
> more important that our parks, wouldn’t it make sense to work towards 
> changing that?
> But wait, you say, we can vote them out of office! Yet every at-large 
> incumbent won in the primary. So, it seems that the voters don’t share your 
> (or my) views.
>  
> Maybe we should just move out of the neighborhood and city to someplace where 
> the people do care.
>  
>  
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Glenn
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 8:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [UC] Inga Saffron on the privatization
>  
> Actually, public funds cover only a small part of the cost of city parks 
> nowadays. While Fairmount Park managed to secure some government money before 
> the recession hit, and then topped off with federal stimulus dollars, few of 
> the new parks would be seeing the light of day without heavy underwriting 
> from philanthropic foundations, nonprofits, and private institutions. For 
> better or worse, outside interests have become the lead player in planning 
> and maintaining an entire generation of what we still like to call public 
> parks.
> 
> http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/20110527_Changing_Skyline__A_bumper_crop_of_new_parks_sprouting_in_Philadelphia.html
> 
> 
> I think those people who understand disaster capitalism and privatization, do 
> not look upon this privatization as fondly as Ms. Saffron. 
> 
>  How long will the Penn Park remain open to the public?  Will it remain 
> "public" after Fairmount park is sold?
> 
> I hope people see that "parks" will now be commercial spaces and rental 
> venues.  And when the public resources are used up by these "partnerships," 
> who will take care of the parks in the cities neighborhoods where upscale 
> coffee shops will not thrive?
> 
> 

Reply via email to