The last few paragraphs of this report sound eerily familiar to what has happened in this district over the past ten years. The plutocracy recognizes that its multiple tactics have rendered the middle class unable to stand up for the core processes of a Republic.

The poor always get hammered in bad economic times, but the "dismantling of democracy" in Wisconsin, PA, etc. is exactly what was cheered for here over the past ten years. Over the entire state, they are using the same FOCP/UCD tactics and sound bite lies that we've watched and accepted.

As I've long understood, our gentrification was one of many pilot experiments around the country which was indeed being studied. The Penn takeover helped establish that the middle class was prepared to give up the Republic and democratic principles, as soon as any real or manufactured crisis opened the door. In this district, the crisis was completely manufactured and the "good folks" cheered.

People thought they could abandon democracy up to 50th St. and then get it back whenever the corporate overseers came to their front door. That isn't what our forgotten history teaches!

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110704_Criticism_for_cuts_to_programs_that_help_people_get_off_welfare.html?page=1&c=y

Advocates and budget analysts were puzzled by the legislature's eleventh-hour decision to allow the Department of Public Welfare to make decisions about welfare, Medicaid, and food stamps without legislative input or oversight. An already opaque organization will be granted still more power to make decisions affecting the poor without scrutiny, advocates say.

"This is a major dismantling of democracy in Pennsylvania," said Mariana Chilton, a professor in the Drexel University School of Public Health and a leading national expert on hunger. "It cuts out the advocates who can help fight for those who are poor. This is a backdoor magic trick."

Sharon Ward, executive director of the nonprofit Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center, said she wondered why "such sweeping changes were made in secrecy with 15 minutes' notice two days before the legislature left for the summer."

Last week, DPW Secretary Gary Alexander told The Inquirer that the changes were not meant to circumvent public scrutiny, adding: "Anything we do will be done in an open fashion, with stakeholder input and with public comment."

But a skeptical Ward countered, "If you're willing to involve the public in a full review of policy changes, then you don't need expedited rule-making authority."



----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to