Thank you once again for showing us all exactly who you are and why. You're expert use of the English language and the ability to use it makes your greatness shine. There is however a bombastic edge that doesn't go unnoticed. You do provide us with a great service Mohel and I can't take that away from you. I will now take your next wave of $5 words without further response.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Glenn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 8/13/2011 1:56 PM, robert rathmann wrote: >> >> I have not ridiculed you >> or your followers. > > Rat writes: "Dude... get a life or at least take the time to enjoy the one > you have." > > > > OK Here is the credit for what you wrote to begin this exchange. This was > your entire post. Everyone can see that you are not telling the truth. > > It is called ad hominem. You lamely attempted to attack my personality in > an attempt to silence the serious issues I addressed. You interjected > nothing more. It is considered a fallacy of logic. It doesn't support your > happiness delusions, nor does it refute anything I said. > > This stuff doesn't make you or Van Helder look smart except to each other. > It is considered an attempt to bully. It doesn't effect me because I've > been dealing with the FOCP for years and ad hominem is their primary > strategy when they are betraying the people of this community. But it > bullies the people on the listserv who might be intimidated from speaking up > because of jackasses like Van Helder, FOCP leaders, and others who copy > them. > > I just insulted FOCP leaders and Van Helder. That is not the ad hominem > fallacy because I've identified the behavior that deserves those appropriate > insults. Do you understand the difference? I shortened your name to Rat to > insult you and I did that because of your use of ad hominem. Lots of people > dishonestly equate insults with ad hominem when they are trying to deceive > people and then cry out, civility. Deceptions are not the same as civility. > And insulting the jackasses is sometimes important. It often helps show > that bullies and oppressors can be confronted. > > > I would try to get you to reevaluate calling the loss of rights of those > outside your circles, a minor inconvenience. Nor is the misuse of taxpayer > money a minor inconvenience while so many people suffer severe hardships! > But you don't appear to have sufficient civic literacy or empathy for > others to make the effort worth while. > > The reason that Americans are not smiling as much as I do is not a lack of > parklets or ingratitude to dishonest gentrifiers, who you call creative. > > Living life fully and honestly, > Glenn > > > > > > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
