William,

Local Government failing or succeeding was not my point...  I don't agree with 
you at all...   All in all we've had some rather good people since Clark... 
including Green, Goode, Street, and Nutter - with some extreme exceptions for 
sure (like Frank Rizzo, others) so, the underfunding for city services has a 
whole lot more to do with Republican-esque greed / theft of the economy on a 
global scale as well as Federal Reserve Banking / Wall St.  Investment 
rip-offs, Lending & Insurance rip-offs other aspects of dis-Banking, National 
war priorities +++, State government piracy > privatization of public 
resources, Corporations getting ever less responsible or regulated, Supreme 
Court tending towards fascistic rulings... Despotic induced hysterical Police 
State reactions to what were most likely False - flag attacks... etc.

Rick Conrad

On Oct 3, 2011, at 2:51 PM, William H. Magill wrote:

> Rich, what you and Glenn fail to acknowledge in your tirades against such 
> districts  (CCD BID, whatever acronym you want) is one simple fact…
> 
> They exist SOLELY because Local Government is a Failure!  
> 
> … be it Police or Sanitation, the only area where Local Government (let alone 
> State of Federal) succeeds is with Fire protection.
> 
> Of course, one could take the position that Local Government chooses NOT to 
> provide Police or Sanitation as a way to force the Privatization of those 
> services. …  But that could only be possible under Republican Administrations 
> -- not Democratic ones -- like Philadelphia has been for the past 59 years 
> (Since Joe CLark in 1952.)
> 
> 
> On Oct 3, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Richard Conrad wrote:
> 
>> <http://www.downtowndc.org/> "For years the DowntownDC BID has worked in 
>> cooperation with the Metropolitan, Metro Transit, and US Park Police to 
>> provide personal safety information to area employees and visitors at 
>> lunchtime Information Lobby Fairs. This August, we expanded and modified the 
>> Lobby Fair program to focus more on the BID and the multifaceted work of our 
>> uniformed Safety/Hospitality and Maintenance (SAM) employees."
>> 
>> Glenn,  I looked at that site a bit...  
>> 
>> Compared to help with financing / and housing programs, compared to social 
>> economic reforms / and free access to legal and jobs skills (training and 
>> usage); compared to jobs for peace, and a general returning to Faith, Hope, 
>> and Charity... the instituting of only more private ownership of Police and 
>> Safety patrols is somewhat like: "All the King's Horses and all the King's 
>> Men, couldn't put Humpty together again.."
>> 
>> What an ironic thing, they decided to call their uniformed force "SAM"...  
>> when the acronym did not include their "Hospitality" word and should 
>> actually be "SHAM", which is what it sort of sounds like, or "SHAME" which 
>> it sounds like too... though if you put it in Hebrew just slightly 
>> juxtaposed, it could be Shmae (as in Watch Out!).  
>> 
>> Reminds me of that famous allegorical restauranteer who's food kept making 
>> people sick; and then the cook was quoted on their menu as saying "Please 
>> come back soon, we love to hospitalize people."
>> 
>> On Oct 2, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Glenn wrote:
>> 
>>> http://www.downtowndc.org/issues/branding
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Lots of people here in the UCD still believe that the gentrification of 
>>> West Philly was a local "vision" from Penn power brokers like Fry, Rodin, 
>>> etc.  While the Wharton university is a huge player on K St. and Wall St., 
>>> the BIDification of urban centers is all part of a much larger nightmarish 
>>> corporate scheme for the entire planet.  (Think of Fry and Rodin more as 
>>> used car salesmen than despicable intellectuals)
>>> 
>>> Homeless outreach teams, pedestrian "studies", branding, etc. are copied 
>>> and pasted for BIDs everywhere, just like the laws introduced by the 
>>> Democrats/Republicans! (compare the web site to UCD) This international BID 
>>> movement was never based on merely making Melanie happy!  I believe an 
>>> increased number of district consumers now understand that a primary UCD 
>>> goal was always gentrification and not the cleaner and safer nonsense.
>>> 
>>> But I think local consumers still need to wake up to the fact that our CCD 
>>> and UCD are very much a part of a much larger international neo-liberal 
>>> paradigm.  Swallowing all public assets and destroying citizenship and 
>>> rights (ie. peaceful assembly, free speech, etc.) are as much a part of the 
>>> BID movement, as shifting wealth to connected cronies in the plutocracy.  
>>> It's also about creating unlimited private taxation and spending power over 
>>> a vulgar enslaved consumer culture, while representative democracy is 
>>> rendered useless.  (The entire population of the city is subsidizing BID 
>>> territory, while the necessary resources of other neighborhoods are being 
>>> stolen through grants, parklets, park redesigns, etc.)
>>> 
>>> Compare the web sites and start considering "special service districts" 
>>> beyond the obvious gentrification, feudalistic control over the petty 
>>> bourgeoisie, and crony corruption/capitalism.  As despicable as those goals 
>>> are, international BIDification is much larger and comprehensive.   This 
>>> will become much more apparent when folks see that our UCD/CCD was not some 
>>> local nightmare!
>>> 
>>> Glenn
>>> PS:  Freedom plaza, where the occupation of DC will begin Oct. 6, lies in 
>>> the domain of this DC BID
>>> ----
>>> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
>>> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
>>> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
>> 
> 
> William H. Magill
> Block Captain
> 4400 Chestnut Street
> 
> 

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to