???? - Alcohol, Gambling, Drugs, and Murder - They say it's o.k. but only for authorized private money corps or government... otherwise not... but one drink without 'authority' - a life interrupted for much time of troubles????
6th Sixth Amendment affirms and protects peoples rights to justice including having a fair and un-delayed public trial by jury, and such rights as to be notified of accusations, to present defense and confront accusers in a court of law, to obtain witnesses and to be provided with responsible legal counsel. On Mar 17, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Glenn moyer wrote: > > When a workman didn't return from lunch one day, I learned that he had been > cuffed in Clark Park and taken to the 18th district for several hours. He > explained later that Philly's finest told him that "there are powerful people > in the neighborhood" and they won't tolerate beer in Clark park. > > Note: He was eating a sandwich. He was not drinking the beer, which was in a > paper bag beside him with the cap on! > > > He was subsequently required to go to "community court." He was sentenced to > two days on the UCD chain gang and given a $225 fine. Well, now we have a > beer garden planned for Clark Park. > > (Note: Community court is a mass processing center where one is guilty with > no chance to prove otherwise. It is the bastardization of an old health care > intervention model to divert non-violent drug offenders away from the > criminal injustice system, but in its bastardized form causes serious harm to > society. I did a great deal of professional work in this area and wrote the > first known proposal to deliver intense drug treatment to addicted parolees > in the city. Please note: most victims of these community courts do not have > addictions, but are part of disempowered communities. Mandated treatment is a > total lie and waste of expensive tx resources!) > > > I hope some people recognize that the privatization and commercialization of > our parks is done in a step by step process over time! (e.g. The redesign of > Clark Park and formation of the "invitation only" Clark Park Partnership took > 7-8 years.) The new, prohibitively high rent, to obtain mandatory permits > for peasants was announced last year by the city, but waivers were given to > all at first. > > Before imposing the new park rents to end all non-corporate community > activities, it makes sense to begin the special commercial uses first, and > then withdraw waivers from all groups except the special service district and > its obedient sycophants, FOCP. Commercial uses of the parks will be > normalized, and those banned from the park through the prohibitively high > costs of permits will believe that connected special service districts don't > get rent waivers, but they will. > > It was clear from my research into the secrets about the new park rents that > the ultimate plan is to turn over all permit rents to the special service > districts, which will be the one group that will continue to get rent waivers > for their beer gardens, etc. (I stopped my own research after the UC Review > wrote an absurd and unprofessional piece calling my offer to work with them > on an investigation, rumors.) > > Here is the Nutter plan/the Penn plan: The special service districts are now > called the caretakers of the physical space that was public parks. The park > rents are justified as necessary revenue to care for the physical space. > Based on experience, it's easy for me to see that the rents collected from > volleyball players, community festival groups,etc. will be sent directly to > the special service districts in the final form of the privatization. (Think > of the plan to send property taxes to NIDS and BIDS) > > Do you see why they didn't do all of this at once? With corporate control of > powerful media propaganda, all dimensions of this transformation of parks to > corporate commercial use and profits are marketed individually to a confused > and distracted public. We will all be happy consumers going to Tony West's > beer garden with lots of dollars, as the old community gatherings quietly > disappear. > > You might think that this criminalization of a workman while marketing an > FOCP beer party is a clear violation of the old 14th amendment and equal > protection of the laws within a jurisdiction. Or that misusing permits to > confer special privledges to some that are denied to all would violate a > century of 1st amendment rulings of the supreme court. Well, you would be > correct but the US Constitution is null and void in these United Corporate > States of Plutocracy. (Only a small part of the 2nd amendment is still > active because armed roving gangs will be important to the brutalization > during the final enslavement.) > > > > > > ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named > "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see .
