Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6472
Comment: hi, On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:24, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Public bug report changed: > https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6472 > > Comment: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:09:06PM -0000, Stephan Hermann wrote: > > If debian doesn't have a new version, and real upstream is not responding > > anymore, we shouldn't break UVF for a very questionable package like > > gtk-gnutella. > > from what I read from the mailing list, upstream is not dead, but they > want users to test the current cvs for the upcoming release. > > What makes gtk-gnutella questionable? I don't consider it high > priority, but not questionable.. What I mean is, that breaking UVF for a CVS version should not be considered :) I think we should wait for debian, and hoping that there is a new version coming out before feature freeze :) \sh -- universe-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
