flatspyder wrote: > Can SlimServer not bind to port 80 and then drop privileges? > > Am I right in thinking that what would happen in the case of a 'reverse > proxy' is that someone calls a request for "http://foo.blah";, Apache > receives this and requests the page from "http://foo.blah:9000"; then > re-displays this to the original person under "http://foo.blah";. If > that's right, then that just seems to me to be putting unecessary > overhead into the system. In which case I think I'm better sticking > with the visible re-direct. > > Actually like Beercan suggested, I could use iptables on just this IP > to move all port 80 traffic to port 9000, that would work wouldn't it?
Here's all you need to know: http://www.apacheweek.com/features/reverseproxies R. _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix
