soundcheck wrote: > TXRX=hw:0,0 -- is just an alias. You can use simple Alsa soundcard > indexes (hw:0,0, plughw:1,0 etc. ) with squeezelite, even though they > are not shown with squeezlite -l. > > EDO I would use for USB interfaces. (I'm not sure though, if Triodes > kernel would enhance the Touch performance overall. That's why I asked > Triode some posts back if he touched anything beside the usb sound > driver) > > With or Without EDO?? I prefer my Toolbox over EDO, for > Touch-SPDIF-Coax/Toslink/analog. My toolbox pushes the limits a little > further. Obviously EDO is pretty well integrated into the environment > and easy accessible for everybody, it'll be a no-brainer to use it for > the vast majority. > > I compared several well regarded USB-SPDIF converters such as > Audiophilleo II. I prefer my rather heavily tweaked Touch over these > interfaces. > > For those who'd like to run a headless Touch, my Toolbox and EDO (not > the EDO kernels for USB-dacs) become obsolete (soon) due to squeezelite > + some minor tweaks anyhow. > > Cheers
for spdif out myself and many others find the Soundcheck Toolbox takes the sound in the wrong direction - too strident and digital so prefer using the tweaks in my blog http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/ As TT has tcp and kernel optimisations are you saying that EDO and squeezelite already have these and therefore squeezelite just requires priority tweaks ? I feel the tcp and kernel tweaks still make a difference. enjoy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97046 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
