Triode wrote:
>
> Edit - does something like this do anything useful:
>
> >
Code:
--------------------
> >
> --- a/decode.c
> +++ b/decode.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static void *decode_thread() {
>
> if (!ran) {
> usleep(100000);
> + } else {
> + usleep(100);
> }
> }
>
--------------------
> >
Not sure it is going to make any difference. Gut feeling rather than
scientific fact..... The first block of data run through resample lib
after it is initialised causes momentary spike. Not sure any fiddling
with thread priority or delay is going to alleviate that.....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544
_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
