JackOfAll wrote: > > So back to the question, and assuming the CSOS F19 release stays as-is > with 3.0.35 as the default kernel, where do we go with it? Can you guys > running it give me any reason not to make it the recommended "current" > CSOS release and to suggest anyone currently running a prior CSOS > release, upgrade to it?
I do not mind sticking with 3.0.35 for F19. Maybe for Fedora 20 we'll have to revisited assuming Wandboard Quad/Dual support will be stable in kernel 3.12 or 3.13. @Clive, any way to provide a kernel-devel package for F19 with 3.0.35? I have looked at your spec file and compared it to a regular Fedora one but did not manage to it to build a devel rpm for 3.0.35. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ lintweaker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=47485 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
