Alcaudon wrote: > I'm so sorry to hear that. It's only temporary!
Alcaudon wrote: > I've been feeling so guilty myself for been using CSOS (for music > reproduction purposes only, I swear :p) > Even if you are using it as a doorstop..... If it makes you happy..... Fine, by me. What's really sad, and this is not funny, when it gets to the point that I need to start every sentence with, "no warranty, express or implied", that's sad! Alcaudon wrote: > > Even if you decide to send this whole project to hell (and I would > totally understand that), thanks!. > Not going anywhere, even if I do need to start every sentence with, "no warranty, express or implied". ;) It's probably a good thing that this has brought this to a head. Yesterday, I was laughing. Cause me trouble? Really? What are you going to do? Complain that I'm a "tin pot dictator" because I refuse to include something that you want in an image, even though I've given you a pretty solid reason why it is not possible to do so, without me agreeing to pay Oracle a per-unit "royalty". Turns out, we need to have covered every possible eventuality, that may never, ever happen, before it happens. It's not a bad thing, I suppose. We now have commercial entities already selling hardware products, using the CS image. And a Korean, (who's email I could never make head or tail of, think it was written in Korean and then mashed via Google translate into what I received), talking about 'thermometer bits', and I've no idea whether that is to do with multi-bit, ladder, R2R DAC technology or some industrial application, that he was using our image for. <humour>I blame the Yanks. Common sense? What common sense? They are taking each other to court and hoping for unlimited damages to be awarded, at the drop of a hat. Blame has to be assigned. Someone else has to pay. Can't find Europe on a map, but understand how to "play" the judicial process to "win". Do they teach that at school instead of geography? I'm reminded of a "news" story I read, maybe a year ago. Goes something like this.... Mummy and Daddy take little Johnny to the zoo for the day. At the camel enclosure, one of the camels farts. (Loudly, I suppose. I've never been up close to a farting camel so have no experience of this myself.) Little Johnny starts to cry. A day later, Mummy and Daddy are suing the zoo for the psychological damage caused to little Johnny! Only in America! LOL. Do parents there not explain to their kids from an early age that all animals fart? Do American kids grow up thinking that only Daddy farts? Or maybe no one born in the land of the free and home of the brave farts? Probably too frightened to fart in case someone sues them for psychological damage! ;)</humour> Alcaudon wrote: > > Wish I could help way more than providing these lame support words, > maybe I could mail you a couple of beers, or even a couple of wine > bottles, to cheer you up a little bit :D. Appreciate the thought! PS. Apologies in advance if anyone is offended by my attempts at humour, especially if you happen to be American. But according to my legal advice, it's all your fault! (I think that was a general, everything that is wrong with the world is your fault, rather than you are to blame for the litigious world we live in.) You want their name? What for? You want to sue them for defamation? Really? ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
