JackOfAll wrote: 
> Lintweaker, loose ends on your mytekusb2 driver.... Sent you a pull
> request for a Makefile patch after forking your git. No worries if you
> don't want to pull it, I'll carry it as a patch, but should be
> transparent for your builds and users on other distros, while at the
> same time allowing me to pass in the BUILD variables from the akmods
> build. 
> 
> 
I pulled it, thanks.

JackOfAll wrote: 
> 
> Which BTW, if you have a F20 install either i386 or x86_64, install the
> CS repo and rpmfusion repo packages as documented on the website repo
> page and ....
> 
> > 
Code:
--------------------
  >   > 
  > sudo yum install akmod-mytekusb2
  > 
--------------------
> > 
> 
> I'm not going to provide the pre-compiled kernel version specific
> binary modules, (otherwise I'll need to keep them up to date every
> time Fedora push a new kernel build), just the akmod-mytekusb2
> package, which will result in the module being built for the currently
> in-use kernel on initial install of the akmod-mytekusb2 package, and
> for any new kernels that are installed in the future, via the
> akmods.service. 
> 
> The akmod-mytekusb2 package (and the kmod-mytekusb2 packages it builds
> and installs) has a dependency on mytekusb2-kmod-common which is
> provided by the mytekusb2-firmware package, so that should be
> pulled-in as a dep on install of the akmod-mytekusb2 package. 
> 
> The module loads, that's as far as I can go in terms of testing. If
> you could test with F20 i386 or x86_64 pending the arrival of the F20
> ARM image. No problem if that is too much hassle. (NB. There is a
> dmesg warning when loading the module, about the lack of a signature.
> Think all the Fedora kernel modules are signed now, at least on i386
> and x86_64, not sure that is the case on arm kernel builds. Don't
> believe it should cause an issue other than the warning.)
> 
> If this all works out OK, and you are happy with it, I'll keep the
> akmod packages up to date for i386 and x86_64 as well for arm. Maybe
> if you know of any users who build the driver manually on Fedora, you
> might want to point them towards using the CS repo. Just give me a
> "ping" if you make any significant git updates and want me to pull
> from git and "push" a new build.

Great, I'll give it a try!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
lintweaker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=47485
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99395

_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to