Triode wrote: > OK - lets confirm what we want (and not have a different option for each > user...) > > I can see two use cases for this menu: > 1) mount local disks (which there is value in sharing via samba) > 2) mount remote shares (which you probably don't need to share via > samba) > > How many mounts of each type do people expect? I was originally > thinking we should have multiple options /mnt/diskX and allow complete > flexibility, but then people seem to have other uses. Should we have > different mount points for local and remote? I want it to work with a > standard arch system as well as one which has the mount points and samba > created by the soa install. > > Should we have /storage and /mnt/disk[1-6]? Should do this and then > only export /storage via samba?
I like a lot current SoA Samba implementation (/mnt/disk[1-6]), it seems to be very logical and clean looking. I understand that 100 users may have 100 different needs and ideas about functionality... It is relatively easy to edit samba.conf and implement strangest sharing options. (I mostly use samba as an easy access to my custom Brutefir filters... located somwhere in LMS plugin directory.) My 2ยข. Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rob P's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62803 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101624
_______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
