Krisbee wrote: > You might have saved yourself some time if you'd had read some previous > posts re: the cubietruck and SOA. See my #1483 from two months ago. > Posts on the arch arm linux forum would tend to confirm that arch arm > on the cubietruck for audio is a poor choice right now.
Can't confirm that. My Cubitruck setup works better then ever and beats all mi PI(2)s. Meanwhile I managed to get the mainline kernel and the new device-tree handling (replaced script.bin) pretty much under control. I'm running now a stock ARCH, LMS from AUR, squeezelite from google-code plus some OS modifications. No more SoA. Just crossed my mind: A real pity is that Triode went from scripted installation in the early days of SoA to a pre-made packages and binaries based installation. It saved some time for the user. However. Maintenance effort became much higher for him. The scripted method would have been much easier to maintain I guess. Cheers ::: ' Touch Toolbox and more' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com) ::: by soundcheck ------------------------------------------------------------------------ soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34383 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101624 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
