mherger wrote: > Use > http://www.mysqueezebox.com/update/?version=7.9.3&revision=159775317&geturl=1&os=debXXX > > where debXXX is one of debarm, debamd64 or debi386. >
Currently I differentiate between armv7 and armv8 - I assume debarm is for both? (If I rememeber correctly, that was the reason I switchted to the "all"-package.) mherger wrote: > > But I'd have to modify the image, wouldn't I? It's not something Joe > Average would be doing? > > The background of my question is that there are major changes for > Windows and macOS ahead. ActiveState, the vendor of the Perl tools we're > > using on Windows, recently wrote that they would recommend to no longer > > use their dev kit, but use Docker instead. And Apple announced a while > ago that they might be removing scripting languages from macOS. > Therefore a docker image which would "just work" would be great. But we > > can't expect Joe to go to the command line to configure the image. > No, you don't change the image - the image remains. You just tell docker to route the port XXX form the host to the port YYY of the speific container. The thing is that Joe average would not use docker, but Joe docker average would definitely know (or at least should know) how to do that. Why would Joe Average start at all with docker? It the depends on the docs to show that something like that is required - for that reason usually a sample configuration (docker command / docker-compose file) is shown that contains all possible parameters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DOliana's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=68811 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=111828 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
