> On 19 Jan 2021, at 09:49, mherger > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So we've had Docker images for LMS for a few months now, and even I > start to understand :-). At least I start to understand that the current > tagging schema isn't great. We currently have things like 8.1.1-dev and > 8.1.1. But there's no easy way to follow a tag to get updates for eg. > released builds. I'd therefore suggest to start over the tagging with > the following schema (thanks Paul- for the inspiration :-)): > > > - release - this obviously is the release version, currently 8.1.1 > - stable - this is the bugfix branch, based on the release with only > important fixes, currently 8.1.2 > - dev - this is where the good new things happen, but at the risk of > lower robustness (8.2.0) > > > These tags would NOT come with the version number. This allows a > cautious user to use "release", to be on the safe side, only get updates > every few months. But once 8.2.0 was released, he'd still get it. > Similarly "stable" would allow a user to run a stable environment, but > still get the latest bug fixes every few days or weeks, even if they > haven't been released yet. With "dev" you'll be living on the bleeding > edge. > > Does this make sense? Would you consider the lack of version number in > the tag to be a limitation? Thoughts?
This scheme makes sense and it is nicely simple. There are nevertheless two points I would like to raise: 1) Would it make sense to keep the last “stable” of each main version around? 2) The scheme does not include the “latest” tag, which is the default tag. This should be equal to the “stable” tag. Therefore, when no tag is specified, the “stable” (“latest”) will be used. Thanks to everybody making the docker image a reality, Rainer > > > > Michael > > "It doesn't work - what shall I do?" - "Please check your server.log > and/or scanner.log file!" > (LMS: Settings/Information) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > mherger's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=50 > View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113709 > > _______________________________________________ > unix mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
